Compare Nokia Lumia 630 Dual SIM vs Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen

Feature Comparison

  • Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen's Screen Size is 10.0% more
  • Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen's got 50.0% more RAM
 
Nokia Lumia 630 Dual SIM
Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
73 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
56 Value For Money Score
65 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217.7 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 1GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Adreno 305   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
- 2MP   
Camera Details
4x Digital Zoom, Sensor Size 1/4inch, F-Stop f/2.4, Focal Length 28mm Slow Motion Video, Burst Mode, Auto HDR, Panorama, Tap to Focus   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) HD Video Recording (720p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
- Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
Windows Phone 8.1 -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 5.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
129.5 x 66.7 x 9.2 141.5 x 70.7 x 10.99   
Weight
134 grams 149 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Black, White   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 12.79GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1830mAh 2070mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Nokia Lumia 630 Dual SIM vs Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen Specs

Specs
Nokia Lumia 630 Dual SIMMotorola Moto G 2nd Gen  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 512MB1GB  
Battery Capacity 1830mAh2070mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP  

Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Improved camera performance over the 1st gen
  • Good battery life
  • Near stock android keeps things snappy
The Bad
  • No 4G LTE connectivity
  • Average front facing speakers

Nokia Lumia 630 Dual SIM Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Adds Dual SIM functionality that the Lumia 630 misses out on
  • Colourful shells on the device makes the phone attractive
  • These shells can be replaced by the user
  • Exceptional battery life
  • One of the first phones to come with Windows 8.1 out of the box
The Bad
  • Lacks a front facing camera
  • No flash for the rear camera
  • The display has a poor resolution making the screen look grainy
  • The performance is very mediocre

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia Lumia 630 Dual SIM with Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen. When you see Nokia Lumia 630 Dual SIM Vs Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia Lumia 630 Dual SIM stands against Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen and which one you should buy. The best price of Nokia Lumia 630 Dual SIM is currently Rs. 9,299. The lowest price for Motorola Moto G 2nd Gen is Rs. 8,999. The prices for both these products were updated March 26, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page