Compare Nokia Lumia 630 vs Micromax Canvas 6 Pro

Feature Comparison

  • Micromax Canvas 6 Pro has 5.5 inch Screen Size and Nokia Lumia 630 has 4.5 inch Screen Size
  • The 16GB Internal Storage on the Micromax Canvas 6 Pro is 50.0% more
  • The Micromax Canvas 6 Pro has 4GB RAM, which is 87.0% more
 
Nokia Lumia 630
Micromax Canvas 6 Pro
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
37 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
83 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
217.7 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MediaTek MT6795 Helio X10   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 4GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Camera Details
- -   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Windows Phone 8.1 -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
129.5 x 66.7 x 9.2 -   
Weight
134 grams -   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Black   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 10.78GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 64GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1830mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Nokia Lumia 630 vs Micromax Canvas 6 Pro Specs

Specs
Nokia Lumia 630Micromax Canvas 6 Pro  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 512MB4GB  
Battery Capacity 1830mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

Nokia Lumia 630 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Colourful shells on the device makes the phone attractive
  • These shells can be replaced by the user
  • Exceptional battery life
  • One of the first phones to come with Windows 8.1 out of the box
The Bad
  • No Dual SIM
  • Lacks a front facing camera
  • No flash for the rear camera
  • The display has a poor resolution making the screen look grainy

Micromax Canvas 6 Pro Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Unlike most Micromax devices, a well built and a good looking smartphone
  • User removable back panel and replaceable battery
  • 4GB RAM ensures that the performance is virtually lag free
  • On-screen buttons are present
The Bad
  • A ton of pre-installed apps come with the device
  • Any serious gaming leads to the phone heating up
  • No fingerprint scanner
  • Less than adequate battery backup
  • Overall dissapointing camera performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia Lumia 630 with Micromax Canvas 6 Pro. When you see Nokia Lumia 630 Vs Micromax Canvas 6 Pro comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia Lumia 630 stands against Micromax Canvas 6 Pro and which one you should buy. The best price of Nokia Lumia 630 is currently Rs. 10,999. The lowest price for Micromax Canvas 6 Pro is Rs. 8,497. The prices for both these products were updated October 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page