Compare Nokia Lumia 830 vs HTC Desire 828 32GB

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of HTC Desire 828 32GB's is 9.0% more than Nokia Lumia 830
  • HTC Desire 828 32GB's 32GB Internal Storage is more than Nokia Lumia 830's 16GB Internal Storage
  • HTC Desire 828 32GB has 3GB RAM, whereas Nokia Lumia 830 has 1GB RAM
 
Nokia Lumia 830
HTC Desire 828 32GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
60 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
57 Value For Money Score
73 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
10MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
0.9MP 4MP   
Camera Details
Backside-illuminated Image Sensor, Optical Image Stabilization, PureView, True 16:9 Sensor Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Windows Phone Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Windows Phone 8.1 Sense 6.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
139.4 x 70.7 x 8.5 157.7 x 78.9 x 7.9   
Weight
150 grams 148 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black White, Dark Gray   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 27GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 2TB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM + CDMA   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2200mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Nokia Lumia 830 vs HTC Desire 828 32GB Specs

Specs
Nokia Lumia 830HTC Desire 828 32GB  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 10MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2200mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.9MP4MP  

Nokia Lumia 830 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The Aluminium frame on the sides of the phone adds rigidity
  • Excellent camera performance
  • Available in bright colours, which most phones do not offer
  • Rear camera comes with OIS, a bit of a rare feature in mid-range devices
The Bad
  • Overall the Windows ecosystem is weak when it comes to apps
  • Nokia has really cut the corners on the front facing camera
  • Lacks a Full HD display
  • Heavy games struggle on the device

HTC Desire 828 32GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Rear camera has Optical Image Stabilisation (OIS)
  • Crisp Full HD display with a pixel density of 401 PPI
  • Decent battery life
  • Smooth User Interface by HTC
The Bad
  • Lots of bloatware pre-installed
  • No fast charging support
  • Lacks a fingerprint sensor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia Lumia 830 with HTC Desire 828 32GB. When you see Nokia Lumia 830 Vs HTC Desire 828 32GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia Lumia 830 stands against HTC Desire 828 32GB and which one you should buy. The lowest price for HTC Desire 828 32GB is Rs. 12,899. The prices for both these products were updated August 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page