Compare Nokia N8 vs OnePlus X Onyx

Feature Comparison

  • OnePlus X Onyx's Screen Size is 30.0% more
  • Internal Storage of Nokia N8 is the same as OnePlus X Onyx
  • RAM of OnePlus X Onyx's is 91.0% more than Nokia N8
 
Nokia N8
OnePlus X Onyx
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
23 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
49 Value For Money Score
82 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
640 x 360 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED AMOLED   
Pixel Density
209.8 PPI 441 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
680MHz 2.3GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 801   
Processor Type
- Quad-Core   
RAM
256MB 3GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 330   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
12MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Carl Zeiss optics, autofocus, Xenon, 1/1.83'' Sensor Size, ND Filter, Geo-Tagging, Face Detection f/2.2, Phase Detection Autofocus, 1/3" sensor size, 1.14 µm Pixel Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Symbian Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Symbian BELLE Oxygen OS   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS   
Dimensions (mm)
113.5 x 59.1 x 12.9 140 x 69 x 6.9   
Weight
135 grams 138 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gray Onyx Black   
Build Material
Plastic Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1200mAh 2525mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Nokia N8 vs OnePlus X Onyx Specs

Specs
Nokia N8OnePlus X Onyx  
Screen Size 3.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 12MP13MP  
RAM 256MB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1200mAh2525mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP8MP  

OnePlus X Onyx Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good looking device with premium build quality
  • Comfortable size to hold and use with one hand
  • Excellent screen
  • Largely stock Android with a few useful tweaks like Dark Theme thrown in there
The Bad
  • Updates to the latest Android version can be eccentric
  • The phone gets fairly warm even in day to day tasks
  • The rear camera on the back is well below average
  • The side metal trim is prone to picking up scuffs and scratches
  • No NFC or fingerprint scanner

Nokia N8 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The camera is in a class of its own, when it comes to stills and videos both
  • Beautiful Aluminum shell gives the phone premium look and feel
  • AMOLED screen ensures good colour reproduction
  • The screen has Gorilla Glass protection
The Bad
  • The UI on Symbian is still fairly laggy
  • The portrait orientation lacks option to type in QWERTY keyboard
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia N8 with OnePlus X Onyx. When you see Nokia N8 Vs OnePlus X Onyx comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia N8 stands against OnePlus X Onyx and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated August 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page