Compare Nokia N8 vs Panasonic Eluga Ray Max (4GB/64GB)

Feature Comparison

  • The Panasonic Eluga Ray Max (4GB/64GB)'s Screen Size measures in at 5.2 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 32.0% more
  • The 64GB Internal Storage on the Panasonic Eluga Ray Max (4GB/64GB) is 75.0% more
  • Panasonic Eluga Ray Max (4GB/64GB) has 93.0% more RAM
 
Nokia N8
Panasonic Eluga Ray Max (4GB/64GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
26 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
49 Value For Money Score
73 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
3.5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
640 x 360 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
209.8 PPI 424 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
680MHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 430   
Processor Type
- Octa-Core   
RAM
256MB 4GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 505   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
12MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Carl Zeiss optics, autofocus, Xenon, 1/1.83'' Sensor Size, ND Filter, Geo-Tagging, Face Detection Professional Mode, Smart Action, Burst Mode for Capture Images, Panaroma Images Supported, Auto Focus / Fixed Focus, Digital Zoom, F-stop 2.4, 5P Lens, 1.0 Pixel Size, 1/3.1 Sensor Size   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Symbian Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Symbian BELLE -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
113.5 x 59.1 x 12.9 148 x 73 x 9.5   
Weight
135 grams 165 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gray Gold, Space Gray, Rose Gold   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1200mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Quick Charge 3.0   

Nokia N8 vs Panasonic Eluga Ray Max (4GB/64GB) Specs

Specs
Nokia N8Panasonic Eluga Ray Max (4GB/64GB)  
Screen Size 3.5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 12MP16MP  
RAM 256MB4GB  
Battery Capacity 1200mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP8MP  

Nokia N8 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The camera is in a class of its own, when it comes to stills and videos both
  • Beautiful Aluminum shell gives the phone premium look and feel
  • AMOLED screen ensures good colour reproduction
  • The screen has Gorilla Glass protection
The Bad
  • The UI on Symbian is still fairly laggy
  • The portrait orientation lacks option to type in QWERTY keyboard
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Nokia N8 with Panasonic Eluga Ray Max (4GB/64GB). When you see Nokia N8 Vs Panasonic Eluga Ray Max (4GB/64GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Nokia N8 stands against Panasonic Eluga Ray Max (4GB/64GB) and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Panasonic Eluga Ray Max (4GB/64GB) is Rs. 12,499. The prices for both these products were updated August 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page