Compare Obi Worldphone SF1 (3GB/32GB) vs InFocus M808

Feature Comparison

  • InFocus M808 has 3.0% more Screen Size
  • The 32GB Internal Storage on the Obi Worldphone SF1 (3GB/32GB) is 50.0% more
  • Obi Worldphone SF1 (3GB/32GB) has 3GB RAM and InFocus M808 has 2GB RAM
 
Obi Worldphone SF1 (3GB/32GB)
InFocus M808
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
97 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
78 Value For Money Score
79 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
443 PPI 424 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 4 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 Mali-T720 MP3   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Sony Exmor IMX214 Sensor; f/2.0 Aperture -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.0 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
146 x 74 x 8 157.6 x 77.1 x 7.56   
Weight
147 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Silver, Gold, Leather Black   
Build Material
Plastic Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
24.71GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 2450mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
Yes, Quick Charge 1.0 No   

Obi Worldphone SF1 (3GB/32GB) vs InFocus M808 Specs

Specs
Obi Worldphone SF1 (3GB/32GB)InFocus M808  
Screen Size 5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 3GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh2450mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

InFocus M808 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The Metal Unibody design makes the phone look and feel rich
  • Sharp and vivid display with good pixel density of 424PPI
  • Supports 4G LTE on Indian bands
  • Dedicated MicroSD card slot
The Bad
  • Runs outdated Android 5.1 Lollipop
  • User Interface is not up to the mark
  • Just about average cameras
  • Mediocre performance, 2GB of RAM is generally maxed out

Obi Worldphone SF1 (3GB/32GB) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent build quality and an interesting design
  • Unique packaging with a tansparent box
  • Sharp display with good colours
  • Fast charging enabled
The Bad
  • Overall performance can be laggy
  • Camera app is slow and sluggish
  • Gets a little hot when you really push the phone to its maximum limit
  • Camera really struggles in low light shooting

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Obi Worldphone SF1 (3GB/32GB) with InFocus M808. When you see Obi Worldphone SF1 (3GB/32GB) Vs InFocus M808 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Obi Worldphone SF1 (3GB/32GB) stands against InFocus M808 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for InFocus M808 is Rs. 6,690. The prices for both these products were updated October 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page