Compare Oppo F1 Plus vs Oppo F1s

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Oppo F1 Plus is the same as Oppo F1s
  • Oppo F1 Plus has 64GB Internal Storage and Oppo F1s has 32GB Internal Storage
  • Oppo F1 Plus has 25.0% more RAM
 
Oppo F1 Plus
Oppo F1s
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
91 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
81 Value For Money Score
79 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 293.72 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 4 Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Bezel Less
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
2GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6755 Helio P10 MediaTek MT6750   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
4GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T860 MP2 Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
16MP 16MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
ColorOS 3.0 ColorOS 3.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
151.8 x 74.3 x 6.6 154.5 x 76 x 7.38   
Weight
145 grams 160 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, Rose Gold Gold, Rose Gold, Gray, White   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Metal   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
64GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
48.38GB 25.09GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2850mAh 3075mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
Yes, VOOC Flash Charging -   

Oppo F1 Plus vs Oppo F1s Specs

Specs
Oppo F1 PlusOppo F1s  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 4GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2850mAh3075mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 16MP16MP  

Oppo F1 Plus Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality
  • Ample 4GB RAM & 64GB Internal Storage
  • Fast Charging
  • Decent Camera Performance
The Bad
  • Chipset is not Best-in-Class
  • Unoriginal Looks

Oppo F1s Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent front facing camera resulting is great selfies
  • Good battery life, should last through the day most of the time
  • Slim build and aesthetically pleasing design
  • Dedicated MicroSD card slot with Dual SIM support
The Bad
  • No Full HD display is a bummer
  • Dated Android version with no update schedule
  • Charging the device is slow

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo F1 Plus with Oppo F1s. When you see Oppo F1 Plus Vs Oppo F1s comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo F1 Plus stands against Oppo F1s and which one you should buy. The best price of Oppo F1 Plus is currently Rs. 23,200. The lowest price for Oppo F1s is Rs. 16,990. The prices for both these products were updated October 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page