Compare Oppo Find 7 vs Samsung Galaxy On Max

Feature Comparison

  • The Samsung Galaxy On Max's Screen Size measures in at 5.7 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 3.0% more
  • Both Oppo Find 7 and Samsung Galaxy On Max have same Internal Storage
  • Samsung Galaxy On Max's RAM is 25.0% more
 
Oppo Find 7
We Love
Samsung Galaxy On Max
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
88 Value For Money Score
84 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
2560 x 1440 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
534 PPI 386 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
2.5GHz 2.39GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MediaTek Helio P25   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 4GB   
Graphics
Adreno 330 Mali-T880 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Camera Details
1/3" sensor size, geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, HDR -   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.3 Jelly Bean Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
ColorOS UI -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Stereo Speakers, GPS Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
152.6 x 75 x 9.2 156.6 x 78.7 x 8.1   
Weight
173 grams 178 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Gold, Black   
Build Material
- Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 3300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
Yes, VOOC Flash Charge -   

Oppo Find 7 vs Samsung Galaxy On Max Specs

Specs
Oppo Find 7Samsung Galaxy On Max  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 3GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh3300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  

Oppo Find 7 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp Quad HD display with 534PPI
  • Decent performance with Snapdragon 801 combined with 3GB RAM
  • Good battery life
  • Stereo speakers for good multimedia experience
The Bad
  • Runs on way old Android version 4.3 Jelly Bean
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor

Samsung Galaxy On Max Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality
  • Front camera is impressive
  • Great low light camera performance
  • Overall performance is decent
  • Samsung Experience UI is user-friendly and looks clean
The Bad
  • Battery life is pretty average, lacks fast charging as well
  • Software includes some bloatware
  • Speaker is positioned right above the power button

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Find 7 with Samsung Galaxy On Max. When you see Oppo Find 7 Vs Samsung Galaxy On Max comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Find 7 stands against Samsung Galaxy On Max and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy On Max is Rs. 15,900. The prices for both these products were updated September 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page