Compare Oppo Joy R1001 vs Lenovo Phab 2 Plus

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Lenovo Phab 2 Plus's is 37.0% more than Oppo Joy R1001
  • Lenovo Phab 2 Plus has 32GB Internal Storage and Oppo Joy R1001 has 4GB Internal Storage
  • RAM of Lenovo Phab 2 Plus's is 83.0% more than Oppo Joy R1001
 
Oppo Joy R1001
Lenovo Phab 2 Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
10 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
47 Value For Money Score
89 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 6.4 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233.2 PPI 344.2 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6572W MediaTek MT8783   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP1 Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Face Detection, Autofocus, Continuous shooting, Geo tagging, Touch focus, Face detection & Burst Shoot +13MP Rear Camera, Digital zoom, Touch focus, HDR, Panorama, Geotagging, Continuous shooting, Exposure compensation, ISO setting, White balance setting, Face detection, Self-timer, Scene mode   
Video Recording Resolution
480p Video Recording Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, Dual Rear Camera, Laser Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
124 x 63 x 9.9 174 x 88 x 5.5   
Weight
125 grams 218 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Champagne Gold, Gunmetal Gray   
Build Material
Plastic Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 year manufacturer warranty for device and 6 months manufacturer warranty for in-box accessories including batteries from the date of purchase -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
1.3GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1700mAh 4050mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Oppo Joy R1001 vs Lenovo Phab 2 Plus Specs

Specs
Oppo Joy R1001Lenovo Phab 2 Plus  
Screen Size 4 inch6.4 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3MP13MP  
RAM 512MB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1700mAh4050mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP8MP  

Lenovo Phab 2 Plus Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solid build quality
  • Audio output is decent
  • Fast & accurate fingerprint sensor
The Bad
  • Under whelming overall performance
  • Massive size makes it difficult to hold
  • Hybrid second slot
  • Average battery life
  • Schemed dual rear cameras

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Joy R1001 with Lenovo Phab 2 Plus. When you see Oppo Joy R1001 Vs Lenovo Phab 2 Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Joy R1001 stands against Lenovo Phab 2 Plus and which one you should buy. The best price of Oppo Joy R1001 is currently Rs. 12,999. The lowest price for Lenovo Phab 2 Plus is Rs. 13,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 16, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page