Compare Oppo Joy R1001 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (4GB/64GB)

Feature Comparison

  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (4GB/64GB)'s 5.5 inch Screen Size is more than Oppo Joy R1001's 4 inch Screen Size
  • The 64GB Internal Storage on the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (4GB/64GB) is 93.0% more
  • Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (4GB/64GB)'s 4GB RAM is more than Oppo Joy R1001's 512MB RAM
 
Oppo Joy R1001
We Love
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (4GB/64GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
10 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
47 Value For Money Score
85 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233.2 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6572W Qualcomm Snapdragon 625   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 4GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MP1 Adreno 506   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Face Detection, Autofocus, Continuous shooting, Geo tagging, Touch focus, Face detection & Burst Shoot Geo-tagging, touch focus, face/smile detection, HDR, panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
480p Video Recording Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) MIUI 8   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 7.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
124 x 63 x 9.9 151 x 76 x 8.4   
Weight
125 grams 165 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Gold, Black, Dark Gray   
Build Material
Plastic Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 year manufacturer warranty for device and 6 months manufacturer warranty for in-box accessories including batteries from the date of purchase -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
1.3GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1700mAh 4100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- -   

Oppo Joy R1001 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (4GB/64GB) Specs

Specs
Oppo Joy R1001Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (4GB/64GB)  
Screen Size 4 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3MP13MP  
RAM 512MB4GB  
Battery Capacity 1700mAh4100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (4GB/64GB) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Magnificent battery performance
  • Decent cameras on either sides
  • Build quality feels solid
  • Overall performance of the device is eminent
  • Soon to receive Android Nougat
The Bad
  • Hybrid second slot
  • Bloated MIUI 8

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Joy R1001 with Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (4GB/64GB). When you see Oppo Joy R1001 Vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (4GB/64GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Joy R1001 stands against Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (4GB/64GB) and which one you should buy. The best price of Oppo Joy R1001 is currently Rs. 12,999. The lowest price for Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 (4GB/64GB) is Rs. 12,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page