Compare Oppo N1 vs BlackBerry Priv

Feature Comparison

  • The 5.9 inch Screen Size on the Oppo N1 is 8.0% more
  • BlackBerry Priv has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • BlackBerry Priv has 33.0% more RAM
 
Oppo N1
BlackBerry Priv
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
85 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
64 Value For Money Score
60 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.9 inch 5.4 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
373.4 PPI 543.9 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Hexa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 320 Adreno 418   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 18MP   
Front Camera Resolution
13MP 2MP   
Camera Details
Normal, Panorama, High Speed, Rewind, Beautify, and Slow Shutter Optical Image Stabilization, Phase Detection Autofocus, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touch and Type   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
- GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
170.7 x 82.6 x 9 147 x 77.2 x 9.4   
Weight
213 grams 192 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Black   
Build Material
Ceramic Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12.62GB -   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 2TB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3610mAh 3410mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Oppo N1 vs BlackBerry Priv Specs

Specs
Oppo N1BlackBerry Priv  
Screen Size 5.9 inch5.4 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP18MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3610mAh3410mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 13MP2MP  

Oppo N1 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Innovative rotating camera Design
  • Gets gesture support
  • Impressive gaming performance
The Bad
  • Slightly clunky UI
  • Grossly overpriced

BlackBerry Priv Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The device comes with both a Touchscreen and Physical QWERTY keyboard
  • Finally a BlackBerry device running Android
  • The slide out mechanism on the phone is a nice throwback to good old days
  • Premium build quality and feels solid all around
  • Subtle tweaks like bringing BlackBerry Hub to Android are really useful
The Bad
  • Lacks modern day features like fingerprint scanner
  • With the keyboard out, the phone feels top heavy and is not best for one handed usage
  • Front camera lacks details
  • Despite close to stock Android, the performance is not the most fluid
  • Physical keyboard feels too narrow and squeezed

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo N1 with BlackBerry Priv. When you see Oppo N1 Vs BlackBerry Priv comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo N1 stands against BlackBerry Priv and which one you should buy. The best price of Oppo N1 is currently Rs. 31,999. The lowest price for BlackBerry Priv is Rs. 27,900. The prices for both these products were updated October 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page