Compare Oppo N1 vs Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)

Feature Comparison

  • Oppo N1's 5.9 inch Screen Size is more than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)'s 5.5 inch Screen Size
  • Both Oppo N1 and Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) have same Internal Storage
  • RAM of Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)'s is 33.0% more than Oppo N1
 
Oppo N1
We Love
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
71 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
64 Value For Money Score
95 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.9 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
373.4 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Samsung Exynos   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 1.6GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 Exynos 7580   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 320 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
13MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Normal, Panorama, High Speed, Rewind, Beautify, and Slow Shutter Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 7.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
- Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
170.7 x 82.6 x 9 151.5 x 74.1 x 7.3   
Weight
213 grams 172 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- White, Black, Gold   
Build Material
Ceramic Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12.62GB 10.82GB   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3610mAh 3300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
-   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Fast Charging   

Oppo N1 vs Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) Specs

Specs
Oppo N1Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016)  
Screen Size 5.9 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3610mAh3300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 13MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent build quality rivaling that of the Galaxy S6
  • Vibrant display with sharp colours
  • Solid battery life that easily lasts a whole day
  • Samsung bundles the phone with very little bloatware
The Bad
  • The UI overall can be sluggish with lags
  • Not a device meant for gaming as it tends to drop quite a lot of frames
  • Camera app takes a while to launch which leads to missing shots
  • Low light shots from the camera have a lot of noise

Oppo N1 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Innovative rotating camera Design
  • Gets gesture support
  • Impressive gaming performance
The Bad
  • Slightly clunky UI
  • Grossly overpriced

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo N1 with Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016). When you see Oppo N1 Vs Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo N1 stands against Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) and which one you should buy. The best price of Oppo N1 is currently Rs. 31,999. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy A7 (2016) is Rs. 17,490. The prices for both these products were updated October 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page