Compare Oppo N1 vs Sony Xperia XZ 64GB

Feature Comparison

  • Oppo N1's 5.9 inch Screen Size is more than Sony Xperia XZ 64GB's 5.2 inch Screen Size
  • Sony Xperia XZ 64GB has 64GB Internal Storage, whereas Oppo N1 has 16GB Internal Storage
  • Sony Xperia XZ 64GB has 3GB RAM and Oppo N1 has 2GB RAM
 
Oppo N1
Sony Xperia XZ 64GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
53 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
64 Value For Money Score
82 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.9 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
373.4 PPI 424 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 2.1GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 320 Adreno 530   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 23MP   
Front Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Camera Details
Normal, Panorama, High Speed, Rewind, Beautify, and Slow Shutter 1/2.3" sensor size, geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, HDR, panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 7.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
- Water Resistance, Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
170.7 x 82.6 x 9 146 x 72 x 8.1   
Weight
213 grams 161 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio), WiFi Calling   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
- Mineral Black, Platinum, Forest Blue   
Build Material
Ceramic Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12.62GB 48.67GB   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3610mAh 2900mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- Yes   
Fast Charging
- -   

Oppo N1 vs Sony Xperia XZ 64GB Specs

Specs
Oppo N1Sony Xperia XZ 64GB  
Screen Size 5.9 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP23MP  
RAM 2GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3610mAh2900mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  

Sony Xperia XZ 64GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Very impressive display quality at 424PPI with Gorilla Glass 4 protection
  • Top notch performance, thanks to the high end processor and 3GB RAM
  • Water resistance is good to have
  • Clean software ensuring smooth user experience
  • Overall performance of the rear camera is satisfactory
The Bad
  • No major design change, gets boring
  • The back of the phone is a fingerprint magnet

Oppo N1 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Innovative rotating camera Design
  • Gets gesture support
  • Impressive gaming performance
The Bad
  • Slightly clunky UI
  • Grossly overpriced

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo N1 with Sony Xperia XZ 64GB. When you see Oppo N1 Vs Sony Xperia XZ 64GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo N1 stands against Sony Xperia XZ 64GB and which one you should buy. The best price of Oppo N1 is currently Rs. 31,999. The lowest price for Sony Xperia XZ 64GB is Rs. 39,800. The prices for both these products were updated October 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page