Compare Oppo Neo 3 R831K vs Intex Aqua Ace 4G

Feature Comparison

  • Intex Aqua Ace 4G has 10.0% more Screen Size
  • Intex Aqua Ace 4G's got 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • The Intex Aqua Ace 4G's RAM measures in at 3GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 66.0% more
 
Oppo Neo 3 R831K
Intex Aqua Ace 4G
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
17 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
47 Value For Money Score
67 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 840 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
266.2 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
- -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
- Add Face Detection, Gesture Capture, Take Photo While Recording, Voice Capture,Panorama, Mira Vision   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
132 x 65.8 x 9.2 145 x 71.5 x 6.7   
Weight
129 grams 122 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White White, Black   
Build Material
Plastic Glass, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.51GB 10.01GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1900mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Oppo Neo 3 R831K vs Intex Aqua Ace 4G Specs

Specs
Oppo Neo 3 R831KIntex Aqua Ace 4G  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1900mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Oppo Neo 3 R831K Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Battery life lasts a full day
  • Comfortable device to hold due to curved back
  • Dual SIM card slot available as well as a Micro SD slot for memory expansion
The Bad
  • Dated Android OS and poor overall performance
  • No HD display
  • Poor camera quality

Intex Aqua Ace 4G Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp AMOLED display with Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Ample 3GB of RAM for excellent multitasking experience
  • Support 4G LTE network in India
The Bad
  • Average battery life
  • Not that great processor performance
  • Android Lollipop is a slight disappointment in Marshmallow era

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Neo 3 R831K with Intex Aqua Ace 4G. When you see Oppo Neo 3 R831K Vs Intex Aqua Ace 4G comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Neo 3 R831K stands against Intex Aqua Ace 4G and which one you should buy. The best price of Oppo Neo 3 R831K is currently Rs. 7,365. The lowest price for Intex Aqua Ace 4G is Rs. 7,499. The prices for both these products were updated November 21, 2017.
Report an error on this page