Compare Oppo Neo 3 R831K vs Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus

Feature Comparison

  • Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus has 5 inch Screen Size, whereas Oppo Neo 3 R831K has 4.5 inch Screen Size
  • Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus's got 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • The 2GB RAM on the Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus is 50.0% more
 
Oppo Neo 3 R831K
Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
21 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
48 Value For Money Score
84 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 840 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
266.2 PPI 441 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 616   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Camera Details
- Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) Vibe UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
132 x 65.8 x 9.2 142 x 71 x 8.2   
Weight
129 grams 142 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Gold, Silver, Dark Gray   
Build Material
Plastic Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.51GB 10.5GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1900mAh 2750mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Oppo Neo 3 R831K vs Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus Specs

Specs
Oppo Neo 3 R831KLenovo Vibe K5 Plus  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1900mAh2750mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Oppo Neo 3 R831K Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Battery life lasts a full day
  • Comfortable device to hold due to curved back
  • Dual SIM card slot available as well as a Micro SD slot for memory expansion
The Bad
  • Dated Android OS and poor overall performance
  • No HD display
  • Poor camera quality

Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solid build quality with a compact design that is great for one handed usage
  • Thanks to Dolby Atmos powered dual speakers at the back, the audio output is good from the phone
  • The phone supports ANT VR headset that Lenovo sells separately
  • Sharp display with vibrant colour output
The Bad
  • The capacitive buttons below the display are not backlit
  • The chrome ring running around the phone picks up scratches easily
  • Battery really struggles to make past a whole day on moderate usage
  • There is no mention of any sort of protection on the display

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Neo 3 R831K with Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus. When you see Oppo Neo 3 R831K Vs Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Neo 3 R831K stands against Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Lenovo Vibe K5 Plus is Rs. 9,249. The prices for both these products were updated April 28, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page