Compare Oppo Neo 3 R831K vs LeEco Le 1s Eco

Feature Comparison

  • LeEco Le 1s Eco has 5.5 inch Screen Size and Oppo Neo 3 R831K has 4.5 inch Screen Size
  • The LeEco Le 1s Eco's got 32GB Internal Storage, while Oppo Neo 3 R831K's Internal Storage is 4GB
  • The RAM on LeEco Le 1s Eco is 66.0% more
 
Oppo Neo 3 R831K
LeEco Le 1s Eco
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
13 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
47 Value For Money Score
77 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 840 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
266.2 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6795T Helio X10   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
- PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- -   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- -   
Camera Details
- Continuos Shooting, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) , Digital Zoom, Auto Flash, Digital image stabilization, Face detection, Touch to focus,   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) EUI 5.5   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
- -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
132 x 65.8 x 9.2 151.1 x 74.2 x 7.5   
Weight
129 grams 169 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Gold, Silver   
Build Material
Plastic Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.51GB 24.4GB   
Card Slot
Yes No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
2G Bands
- -   
3G Bands
- -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1900mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Oppo Neo 3 R831K vs LeEco Le 1s Eco Specs

Specs
Oppo Neo 3 R831KLeEco Le 1s Eco  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1900mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

LeEco Le 1s Eco Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sturdy finish and premium metallic build
  • Vibrant 1080p Display
  • Smooth Performance
  • InfraRed Universal Remote Control Function
  • Fingerprint Sensor
The Bad
  • Average camera performance
  • Confusing User Interface

Oppo Neo 3 R831K Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Battery life lasts a full day
  • Comfortable device to hold due to curved back
  • Dual SIM card slot available as well as a Micro SD slot for memory expansion
The Bad
  • Dated Android OS and poor overall performance
  • No HD display
  • Poor camera quality

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Neo 3 R831K with LeEco Le 1s Eco. When you see Oppo Neo 3 R831K Vs LeEco Le 1s Eco comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Neo 3 R831K stands against LeEco Le 1s Eco and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated November 20, 2017.
Report an error on this page