Compare Oppo Neo 3 R831K vs Xolo Black 3GB

Feature Comparison

  • Xolo Black 3GB has 5.5 inch Screen Size and Oppo Neo 3 R831K has 4.5 inch Screen Size
  • Xolo Black 3GB has 16GB Internal Storage and Oppo Neo 3 R831K has 4GB Internal Storage
  • Xolo Black 3GB's 3GB RAM is more than Oppo Neo 3 R831K's 1GB RAM
 
Oppo Neo 3 R831K
Xolo Black 3GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
20 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
48 Value For Money Score
81 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 840 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
266.2 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Camera Details
- +2MP Rear Camera, HDR, Red eye, Geo tagging removal, Panorama capture, Zero Shutter Lag, Supports Ubifocus, ChromaFlash Optizoom   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual Rear Camera, LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
132 x 65.8 x 9.2 155.5 x 76.6 x 73   
Weight
129 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Black   
Build Material
Plastic Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2.51GB 11.08GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1900mAh 3200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Qualcomm Quick Charge 1.0   

Oppo Neo 3 R831K vs Xolo Black 3GB Specs

Specs
Oppo Neo 3 R831KXolo Black 3GB  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1900mAh3200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Oppo Neo 3 R831K Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Battery life lasts a full day
  • Comfortable device to hold due to curved back
  • Dual SIM card slot available as well as a Micro SD slot for memory expansion
The Bad
  • Dated Android OS and poor overall performance
  • No HD display
  • Poor camera quality

Xolo Black 3GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality and design
  • Decent rear and front cameras, front camera has an LED Flash as well
  • Good multitasking experience, thanks to 3GB RAM
  • Sharp display with Gorilla Glass 3 protection
The Bad
  • Sluggish User Interface at times
  • Not a great device for gaming or performing graphic intensive tasks
  • Hybrid SIM slot, limits storage to 16GB if the device is used with two SIMs

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Neo 3 R831K with Xolo Black 3GB. When you see Oppo Neo 3 R831K Vs Xolo Black 3GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Neo 3 R831K stands against Xolo Black 3GB and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated October 24, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page