Compare Oppo Neo 7 vs LeEco Le 1s Eco

Feature Comparison

  • The 5.5 inch Screen Size on the LeEco Le 1s Eco is 9.0% more
  • The LeEco Le 1s Eco's Internal Storage measures in at 32GB. When compared to the other product's Internal Storage, it is 50.0% more
  • LeEco Le 1s Eco's got 66.0% more RAM
 
Oppo Neo 7
LeEco Le 1s Eco
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
56 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
68 Value For Money Score
84 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
220.3 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MediaTek MT6795T Helio X10   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
- PowerVR G6200   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
- Continuos Shooting, High Dynamic Range mode (HDR) , Digital Zoom, Auto Flash, Digital image stabilization, Face detection, Touch to focus,   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- EUI 5.5   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
142.7 x 71.7 x 7.55 151.1 x 74.2 x 7.5   
Weight
141 grams 169 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Gold   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
9.7GB 24.4GB   
Card Slot
Yes No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2420mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Oppo Neo 7 vs LeEco Le 1s Eco Specs

Specs
Oppo Neo 7LeEco Le 1s Eco  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2420mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

LeEco Le 1s Eco Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sturdy finish and premium metallic build
  • Vibrant 1080p Display
  • Smooth Performance
  • InfraRed Universal Remote Control Function
  • Fingerprint Sensor
The Bad
  • Average camera performance
  • Confusing User Interface

Oppo Neo 7 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Compatible with 4G LTE bands in India
  • The phone is quite a looker thanks to a glass and metal build
  • The screen doubles as a flash when taking selfies for brighter snaps
The Bad
  • The display is not HD which leads to poor viewing experience
  • The rear camera over the period of usage tends to get sluggish
  • TFT display instead of LCD or AMOLED, which makes the colors look dull

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Neo 7 with LeEco Le 1s Eco. When you see Oppo Neo 7 Vs LeEco Le 1s Eco comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Neo 7 stands against LeEco Le 1s Eco and which one you should buy. The best price of Oppo Neo 7 is currently Rs. 8,199. The lowest price for LeEco Le 1s Eco is Rs. 9,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page