Compare Oppo Neo 7 vs LG X Cam

Feature Comparison

  • LG X Cam has 5.2 inch Screen Size and Oppo Neo 7 has 5 inch Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Oppo Neo 7 is the same as LG X Cam
  • LG X Cam has 50.0% more RAM
 
Oppo Neo 7
LG X Cam
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
69 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
68 Value For Money Score
77 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
220.3 PPI 424 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.14GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP3   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Camera Details
- +5MP Rear Camera, Wide-Angle lens, Geo-tagging, Face Detection, Touch Focus   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual Rear Camera, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- LG UI 5.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
142.7 x 71.7 x 7.55 147.50 x 73.60 x 6.90   
Weight
141 grams 118 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Titan Silver, Gold, Pink Gold   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
9.7GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2420mAh 2520mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Oppo Neo 7 vs LG X Cam Specs

Specs
Oppo Neo 7LG X Cam  
Screen Size 5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2420mAh2520mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  

LG X Cam Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Handy form factor with slim design
  • Good dual rear camera outpot
  • Sharp and vivid display with 424PPI
  • Runs on the latest Android Marshmallow out of the box
The Bad
  • Mediocre performance, not for heavy tasks
  • Battery capacity is average, thanks to the Full HD display running
  • Plastic build quality makes it feel cheap
  • No fingerprint scanner is major drawback
  • Lacks 4K recording capability

Oppo Neo 7 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Compatible with 4G LTE bands in India
  • The phone is quite a looker thanks to a glass and metal build
  • The screen doubles as a flash when taking selfies for brighter snaps
The Bad
  • The display is not HD which leads to poor viewing experience
  • The rear camera over the period of usage tends to get sluggish
  • TFT display instead of LCD or AMOLED, which makes the colors look dull

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Neo 7 with LG X Cam. When you see Oppo Neo 7 Vs LG X Cam comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Neo 7 stands against LG X Cam and which one you should buy. The best price of Oppo Neo 7 is currently Rs. 8,200. The lowest price for LG X Cam is Rs. 11,599. The prices for both these products were updated August 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page