Compare Oppo Neo 7 vs LYF F1S

Feature Comparison

  • The LYF F1S's Screen Size measures in at 5.2 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 3.0% more
  • LYF F1S's Internal Storage is 50.0% more
  • RAM of LYF F1S's is 66.0% more than Oppo Neo 7
 
Oppo Neo 7
LYF F1S
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
48 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
68 Value For Money Score
95 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
220.3 PPI 423 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 Qualcomm Snapdragon 652   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 510   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
- Auto Frame Rate , Red Eye Reduction, Continuous Auto Focus,Video HDR supported in code Chroma Flash, OptiZoom, UbiFocus ( MultiFocus ), LLV, LLP, EIS   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, EIS, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
142.7 x 71.7 x 7.55 148 x 73.1 x 7.7   
Weight
141 grams 146 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Black Black, Gold   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Metal   
Device Warranty
- 2 Years   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year standard + 1 Year additional on registering with LYFCare App   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
9.7GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2420mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

Oppo Neo 7 vs LYF F1S Specs

Specs
Oppo Neo 7LYF F1S  
Screen Size 5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP16MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2420mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

LYF F1S Pros & Cons

The Good
  • It supports USB Type-C
  • The build quality is admirable
  • Gaming experience is satisfactory
  • Can record 4K videos
The Bad
  • Misses out on fingerprint scanner
  • Mediocre camera quality

Oppo Neo 7 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Compatible with 4G LTE bands in India
  • The phone is quite a looker thanks to a glass and metal build
  • The screen doubles as a flash when taking selfies for brighter snaps
The Bad
  • The display is not HD which leads to poor viewing experience
  • The rear camera over the period of usage tends to get sluggish
  • TFT display instead of LCD or AMOLED, which makes the colors look dull

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo Neo 7 with LYF F1S. When you see Oppo Neo 7 Vs LYF F1S comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo Neo 7 stands against LYF F1S and which one you should buy. The best price of Oppo Neo 7 is currently Rs. 8,199. The lowest price for LYF F1S is Rs. 8,772. The prices for both these products were updated August 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page