Compare Oppo R7 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy On Max

Feature Comparison

  • Samsung Galaxy On Max has 12.0% more Screen Size
  • Samsung Galaxy On Max has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • RAM of Samsung Galaxy On Max's is 50.0% more than Oppo R7 Lite
 
Oppo R7 Lite
Samsung Galaxy On Max
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
83 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
72 Value For Money Score
84 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
293.7 PPI 386 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 2.39GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MediaTek Helio P25   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 4GB   
Graphics
Adreno 405 Mali-T880 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Camera Details
- -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
143 x 71 x 6.3 156.6 x 78.7 x 8.1   
Weight
147 grams 178 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, Silver Gold, Black   
Build Material
Metal Metal   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM, Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2320mAh 3300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Oppo R7 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy On Max Specs

Specs
Oppo R7 LiteSamsung Galaxy On Max  
Screen Size 5 inch5.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 2GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 2320mAh3300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  

Oppo R7 Lite Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solidly built with no creeks and loose components
  • Metallic body gives the phone a premium feel
  • Excellent battery life
  • Feature full and interesting camera app with lots of customization possible
The Bad
  • No Full HD display
  • The camera really struggles in low light shots
  • Surprisingly there is no NFC or FM Radio
  • Sound output, both from headphones and speakers is below satisfactory

Samsung Galaxy On Max Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality
  • Front camera is impressive
  • Great low light camera performance
  • Overall performance is decent
  • Samsung Experience UI is user-friendly and looks clean
The Bad
  • Battery life is pretty average, lacks fast charging as well
  • Software includes some bloatware
  • Speaker is positioned right above the power button

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Oppo R7 Lite with Samsung Galaxy On Max. When you see Oppo R7 Lite Vs Samsung Galaxy On Max comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Oppo R7 Lite stands against Samsung Galaxy On Max and which one you should buy. The best price of Oppo R7 Lite is currently Rs. 10,999. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy On Max is Rs. 16,900. The prices for both these products were updated August 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page