Compare Panasonic Eluga A2 vs InFocus Turbo 5 (3GB/32GB)

Feature Comparison

  • InFocus Turbo 5 (3GB/32GB)'s 5.2 inch Screen Size is more than Panasonic Eluga A2's 5 inch Screen Size
  • InFocus Turbo 5 (3GB/32GB) has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Both Panasonic Eluga A2 and InFocus Turbo 5 (3GB/32GB) have same RAM
 
Panasonic Eluga A2
InFocus Turbo 5 (3GB/32GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
91 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
70 Value For Money Score
68 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 282 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1GHz 1.25GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6735M MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP2 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Geo tagging, Digital Zoom, Auto Flash, ISO settings, Digital image Stabilization, HDR, Face Detection, Panorama, Simultaneous HD Video and Image Recording, Touch to Focus, Scene mode, Continuous shooting, White balance settings, Exposure compensation -   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
143.80 x 72.00 x 8.90 149.5 x 74 x 8.95   
Weight
167.5 grams 163 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, Metallic Silver Mocha Gold, Glittering Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10.68GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
OTG Support
Yes -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
UMTS 850 / 900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
TD-LTE 2300(band 40) FD-LTE 1800(band 3) / 850(band 5) -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
4000mAh 5000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
Yes No   

Panasonic Eluga A2 vs InFocus Turbo 5 (3GB/32GB) Specs

Specs
Panasonic Eluga A2InFocus Turbo 5 (3GB/32GB)  
Screen Size 5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 3GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 4000mAh5000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Panasonic Eluga A2 with InFocus Turbo 5 (3GB/32GB). When you see Panasonic Eluga A2 Vs InFocus Turbo 5 (3GB/32GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Panasonic Eluga A2 stands against InFocus Turbo 5 (3GB/32GB) and which one you should buy. The best price of Panasonic Eluga A2 is currently Rs. 7,004. The lowest price for InFocus Turbo 5 (3GB/32GB) is Rs. 7,999. The prices for both these products were updated November 23, 2017.
Report an error on this page