Compare Panasonic Eluga Note vs Panasonic Eluga Prim

Feature Comparison

  • Panasonic Eluga Note has 9.0% more Screen Size
  • Panasonic Eluga Note has 32GB Internal Storage and Panasonic Eluga Prim has 16GB Internal Storage
  • Both Panasonic Eluga Note and Panasonic Eluga Prim have same RAM
 
Panasonic Eluga Note
Panasonic Eluga Prim
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
94 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
78 Value For Money Score
77 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
400.53 PPI 293.72 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Asahi Dragontrail Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.25GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6753 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
3GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-720 MP3 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Touch focus, White balance setting, face detection, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Self timer, Scene mode, Panorama, HDR, Digital zoom, Geotagging, Continuous shooting White balance settings, ISO Settings, Exposure compensation, Self-timer, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Touch focus, Face detection, Continuous shooting   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Triple LED Flash Autofocus, Triple LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
FitHome UI -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio Dust Resistance, Fingerprint Scanner, GPS   
Dimensions (mm)
143 × 74.5 × 8.15 -   
Weight
142 grams 138 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Champagne Gold, Rose Gold, Gray Gold, Gun Metal Silver   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
25GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM, Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3000mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Panasonic Eluga Note vs Panasonic Eluga Prim Specs

Specs
Panasonic Eluga NotePanasonic Eluga Prim  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP13MP  
RAM 3GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3000mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Panasonic Eluga Prim Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Clutter-free near stock UI
  • Smudge-free back panel
  • Easy to hold & offers a decent grip
The Bad
  • Lacks a metal unibody design
  • Below average battery life
  • Sub-par camera performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Panasonic Eluga Note with Panasonic Eluga Prim. When you see Panasonic Eluga Note Vs Panasonic Eluga Prim comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Panasonic Eluga Note stands against Panasonic Eluga Prim and which one you should buy. The best price of Panasonic Eluga Note is currently Rs. 8,980. The lowest price for Panasonic Eluga Prim is Rs. 7,915. The prices for both these products were updated October 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page