Compare Panasonic Eluga Turbo vs Asus ZenFone 3 Max (ZC553KL)

Feature Comparison

  • The Asus ZenFone 3 Max (ZC553KL)'s Screen Size measures in at 5.5 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 9.0% more
  • Internal Storage of Panasonic Eluga Turbo is the same as Asus ZenFone 3 Max (ZC553KL)
  • RAM of Panasonic Eluga Turbo is the same as Asus ZenFone 3 Max (ZC553KL)
 
Panasonic Eluga Turbo
Asus ZenFone 3 Max (ZC553KL)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
74 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
72 Value For Money Score
81 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
293.72 PPI 400.53 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6753 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 MP3 Adreno 505   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama Backlight (Super HDR), Low Light, Selfie, Panorama, Beautification, Time Lapse, Effect modes   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
FitHome UI Zen UI 3.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
142.2 x 71.2 x 6.95 151.4 × 76.24 × 8.3   
Weight
145 grams 175 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Marine Blue, Champagne Gold, Rose Gold Titanium Gray, Glacier Silver, Sand Gold   
Build Material
Glass, Plastic Metal   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year on Handset & 6 Months on Accessories.   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
25.13GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2350mAh 4100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Panasonic Eluga Turbo vs Asus ZenFone 3 Max (ZC553KL) Specs

Specs
Panasonic Eluga TurboAsus ZenFone 3 Max (ZC553KL)  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP16MP  
RAM 3GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2350mAh4100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  

Asus ZenFone 3 Max (ZC553KL) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent battery life
  • Good speaker output
  • Vivid display
  • Sturdy build quality
The Bad
  • Fingerprint sensor can be hit or miss at times
  • Average display sharpness
  • Lacks a dedicated storage expansion slot

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Panasonic Eluga Turbo with Asus ZenFone 3 Max (ZC553KL). When you see Panasonic Eluga Turbo Vs Asus ZenFone 3 Max (ZC553KL) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Panasonic Eluga Turbo stands against Asus ZenFone 3 Max (ZC553KL) and which one you should buy. The best price of Panasonic Eluga Turbo is currently Rs. 8,999. The lowest price for Asus ZenFone 3 Max (ZC553KL) is Rs. 10,330. The prices for both these products were updated October 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page