Compare Panasonic P75 vs Intex Cloud Style 4G

Feature Comparison

  • Intex Cloud Style 4G has 60.0% more Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Panasonic P75 is the same as Intex Cloud Style 4G
  • Both Panasonic P75 and Intex Cloud Style 4G have same RAM
 
Panasonic P75
Intex Cloud Style 4G
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
94 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
73 Value For Money Score
70 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 12.7 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Spreadtrum   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6580 Spreadtrum SC7731   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 Mali-400 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 8MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No No   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No No   
Camera Details
White balance settings, Continuous shooting, Panorama, ISO settings, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Expposure compensation, HDR, Geotagging, Touch focus, Self timer F.No(rear) : 2.4, lens(rear) : 4P, 2.8 Aperture, Lens : 3P, Module. 4:3 Aspect Ratio, 2592 * 1944 Pixel Size (Micron), VCM Yes, Module Yes   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light Proximity Sensor, Ambient Light, Gyroscope   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
144.9 x71 x 8.9 145 x 73 x 8.8   
Weight
157 grams 140 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Sand Black, Champagne Gold Champagne, Dark Gray   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- 1.447W/kg   
Head SAR
- 0.262W/kg   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual, Screen Guard Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 32GB   
OTG Support
No No   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz   
3G Bands
UMTS 900 / 2100 MHz WCDMA 900/2100MHz   
4G Bands
- (FDD Band 3,Band 5 TDD Bands :Band 40)   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
5000mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Panasonic P75 vs Intex Cloud Style 4G Specs

Specs
Panasonic P75Intex Cloud Style 4G  
Screen Size 5 inch12.7 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP8MP  
RAM 1GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 5000mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Panasonic P75 with Intex Cloud Style 4G. When you see Panasonic P75 Vs Intex Cloud Style 4G comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Panasonic P75 stands against Intex Cloud Style 4G and which one you should buy. The best price of Panasonic P75 is currently Rs. 5,850. The lowest price for Intex Cloud Style 4G is Rs. 4,897. The prices for both these products were updated November 21, 2017.
Report an error on this page