Compare Samsung Galaxy A3 vs LYF Water 4

Feature Comparison

  • The LYF Water 4 has 5 inch Screen Size, which is 10.0% more
  • Both Samsung Galaxy A3 and LYF Water 4 have same Internal Storage
  • LYF Water 4 has 50.0% more RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy A3
LYF Water 4
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
84 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
70 Value For Money Score
69 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
245 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 4 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama Touch Focus, Face Detection, Manual HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
TouchWiz UI -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
130.1 x 65.5 x 6.9 142 x 70 x 7.7   
Weight
110 grams 138.5 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Midnight Black, Soft Pink, Platinum Silver, Pearl White, Light Blue, Champagne Gold White   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 2 Years   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year standard + 1 Year additional on registering with LYFCare App   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
10GB -   
Card Slot
Yes -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Nano SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
Yes No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1900mAh 2920mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Samsung Galaxy A3 vs LYF Water 4 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy A3LYF Water 4  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1900mAh2920mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

LYF Water 4 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp display at 294PPI
  • Good rear camera in good lighting conditions
  • Decent overall performance
  • Battery life holds up well
The Bad
  • Runs on dated Android 5.1 Lollipop
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor
  • Misses out on storage expansion

Samsung Galaxy A3 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Compact design that is ideal for one-handed usage
  • Good design and a solid build quality
  • Good color reproduction and strong contrasts thanks to AMOLED display
  • The rear camera takes good pictures in well lit conditions
The Bad
  • Performance occasionally can be sluggish
  • No 4G LTE on board
  • No LED notification light
  • Lacks an HD display

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy A3 with LYF Water 4. When you see Samsung Galaxy A3 Vs LYF Water 4 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy A3 stands against LYF Water 4 and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy A3 is currently Rs. 9,999. The lowest price for LYF Water 4 is Rs. 6,425. The prices for both these products were updated August 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page