Compare Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) vs Xiaomi Mi Max 2 (64GB)

Feature Comparison

  • Xiaomi Mi Max 2 (64GB)'s got 6.0% more Screen Size
  • Internal Storage of Xiaomi Mi Max 2 (64GB)'s is 50.0% more than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)
  • RAM of Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) is the same as Xiaomi Mi Max 2 (64GB)
 
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 (64GB)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
89 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
95 Value For Money Score
70 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
6 inch 6.44 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
367 PPI 342 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 4 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.8GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
4GB 4GB   
Graphics
Adreno 510 Adreno 506   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
16MP 12MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Camera Details
1/2.8" Sensor Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, OIS, LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 7.1 Nougat   
OS Detail
TouchWiz UI MiUi 8   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, InfraRed (IR) Blaster, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
161.7 x 80.9 x 7.9 174.1 × 88.7 × 7.6   
Weight
210 grams 211 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, White, Black Black   
Build Material
Glass, Metal Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
24GB -   
Card Slot
- Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
256GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
5000mAh 5300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
Yes Yes, Quick charge 3.0, Parallel charging   

Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) vs Xiaomi Mi Max 2 (64GB) Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)Xiaomi Mi Max 2 (64GB)  
Screen Size 6 inch6.44 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 16MP12MP  
RAM 4GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 5000mAh5300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Magnificent battery life
  • Solid build quality, looks premium
  • Gorgeous AMOLED display
  • Marvellous overall performance
  • Cameras perform excellent in good lighting conditions
The Bad
  • Huge overall footprint makes it uncomfortable to hold
  • Lacks gyroscope sensor
  • Not the snappiest fingerprint sensor

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) with Xiaomi Mi Max 2 (64GB). When you see Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) Vs Xiaomi Mi Max 2 (64GB) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) stands against Xiaomi Mi Max 2 (64GB) and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) is currently Rs. 18,990. The lowest price for Xiaomi Mi Max 2 (64GB) is Rs. 14,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page