Compare Samsung Galaxy Alpha vs Oppo R7 Lite

Feature Comparison

  • Oppo R7 Lite has 5.0% more Screen Size
  • The Samsung Galaxy Alpha has 32GB Internal Storage, which is 50.0% more
  • RAM of Samsung Galaxy Alpha is the same as Oppo R7 Lite
 
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
Oppo R7 Lite
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
87 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
74 Value For Money Score
72 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.7 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED AMOLED   
Pixel Density
312.5 PPI 293.7 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Samsung Exynos Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.8GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Exynos 5430 Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
2GB 2GB   
Graphics
Mali-T628 MP6 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
12MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2.1MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Dual Camera, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection, Panorama, HDR -   
Video Recording Resolution
4K Video Recording (2160p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
TouchWiz UI -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
132.4 x 65.5 x 6.7 143 x 71 x 6.3   
Weight
115 grams 147 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Frosted Gold, Sieek Silver Gold, Silver   
Build Material
Metal, Polycarbonate Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
25.58GB -   
Card Slot
No Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
- 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1860mAh 2320mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Samsung Galaxy Alpha vs Oppo R7 Lite Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy AlphaOppo R7 Lite  
Screen Size 4.7 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 12MP13MP  
RAM 2GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 1860mAh2320mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2.1MP8MP  

Oppo R7 Lite Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Solidly built with no creeks and loose components
  • Metallic body gives the phone a premium feel
  • Excellent battery life
  • Feature full and interesting camera app with lots of customization possible
The Bad
  • No Full HD display
  • The camera really struggles in low light shots
  • Surprisingly there is no NFC or FM Radio
  • Sound output, both from headphones and speakers is below satisfactory

Samsung Galaxy Alpha Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Crisp and vivid AMOLED display with 312PPI
  • Good performance for average usage thanks to the 2GB RAM
  • 12MP rear camera can shoot videos up to 4k
  • 4G LTE support
The Bad
  • Average battery backup
  • No storage expansion option
  • Runs on outdated Android 4.4 KitKat with no hope of update from Samsung

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Alpha with Oppo R7 Lite. When you see Samsung Galaxy Alpha Vs Oppo R7 Lite comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Alpha stands against Oppo R7 Lite and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy Alpha is currently Rs. 20,999. The lowest price for Oppo R7 Lite is Rs. 10,945. The prices for both these products were updated August 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page