Compare Samsung Galaxy Core 2 vs Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA)

Feature Comparison

  • Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA) has 5 inch Screen Size, whereas Samsung Galaxy Core 2 has 4.5 inch Screen Size
  • The 32GB Internal Storage on the Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA) is 87.0% more
  • The 3GB RAM on the Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA) is 75.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy Core 2
Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
20 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
49 Value For Money Score
72 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
207.3 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Asahi Dragontrail Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
- MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
- MediaTek MT6735   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
768MB 3GB   
Graphics
- Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
130.3 x 68 x 9.8 143 x 69.9 x 8.5   
Weight
138 grams 183 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Gold   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2GB 23.52GB   
Card Slot
Yes -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM + CDMA   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 4000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Samsung Galaxy Core 2 vs Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA) Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Core 2Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA)  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 768MB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh4000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp enough display with a pixel density of 294PPI and Asahi Dragontrail Glass protection
  • Ample 3GB of RAM for better multitasking experience
  • Excellent battery backup with the 4000mAh unit
  • 32GB of internal storage
  • Stunning Metal Unibody design
The Bad
  • Average processor performance
  • Still runs on oudated Android 5.1 Lollipop with lots of bloatware pre-installed
  • Expandable storage up to 128GB
  • Average camera performance

Samsung Galaxy Core 2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Compact design
  • 3G connectivity
  • Dedicated Dual SIM slot and Micro SD expansion slot
The Bad
  • Poor battery life
  • Complains of poor touch calibration
  • Slow and sluggish performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Core 2 with Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA). When you see Samsung Galaxy Core 2 Vs Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Core 2 stands against Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA) and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Gionee Marathon M5 Lite (GSM+CDMA) is Rs. 15,209. The prices for both these products were updated August 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page