Compare Samsung Galaxy Core 2 vs Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition

Feature Comparison

  • Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition has 10.0% more Screen Size
  • Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition has 75.0% more Internal Storage
  • Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition's 2GB RAM is more than Samsung Galaxy Core 2's 768MB RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy Core 2
Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
19 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
49 Value For Money Score
79 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
207.3 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
768MB 2GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, Auto-HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
- Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Water Resistance, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
130.3 x 68 x 9.8 142.1 x 72.4 x 11.6   
Weight
138 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White Black, White   
Build Material
- Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2GB 11.81GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes, MicroSD   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2470mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
-   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Turbo Charging   

Samsung Galaxy Core 2 vs Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Core 2Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 768MB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2470mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy Core 2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Compact design
  • 3G connectivity
  • Dedicated Dual SIM slot and Micro SD expansion slot
The Bad
  • Poor battery life
  • Complains of poor touch calibration
  • Slow and sluggish performance

Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good display with a pixel density of 294PPI and Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • Good performance with smooth interface and vanilla Android experience and Android Marshmallow update
  • Water resistant IP67 rating
  • Huge camera quality improvement over previous G series from Motorola
  • VoLTE and Turbo charging support
The Bad
  • Display could have been Full HD
  • Lacks a fingerprint sensor which is a must in the price range

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Core 2 with Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition. When you see Samsung Galaxy Core 2 Vs Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Core 2 stands against Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Motorola Moto G Turbo Edition is Rs. 12,299. The prices for both these products were updated August 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page