Compare Samsung Galaxy Core Prime 4G vs Motorola Moto G4 Play

Feature Comparison

  • Motorola Moto G4 Play's 5 inch Screen Size is more than Samsung Galaxy Core Prime 4G's 4.5 inch Screen Size
  • Motorola Moto G4 Play's got 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • The Motorola Moto G4 Play's got 2GB RAM, while Samsung Galaxy Core Prime 4G's RAM is 1GB
 
Samsung Galaxy Core Prime 4G
Motorola Moto G4 Play
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
63 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
70 Value For Money Score
80 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
207.3 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 Adreno 306   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Camera Details
- Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 7.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Water Resistance, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
131.3 x 68.4 x 8.8 114 x 72 x 9   
Weight
132 grams 137 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White Black, White   
Build Material
Plastic Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 6 months manufacturer warranty for in-box accessories including batteries   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 11GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2000mAh 2800mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes, 10W Rapid Charger   

Samsung Galaxy Core Prime 4G vs Motorola Moto G4 Play Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Core Prime 4GMotorola Moto G4 Play  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2000mAh2800mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Motorola Moto G4 Play Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp and bright display with Gorilla Glass protection
  • Smooth day-to-day performance, thanks to the near Stock Android Marshmallow out of the box
  • 4G LTE support with VoLTE, compatible with Reliance Jio
  • Good battery life with Rapid Charging
  • Water repellant nano coating protects the phone from water spalashes
The Bad
  • Dated processor from last year does not give best of the performance
  • Camera performance is just about average
  • Viewing angles of the display are not that great

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Core Prime 4G with Motorola Moto G4 Play. When you see Samsung Galaxy Core Prime 4G Vs Motorola Moto G4 Play comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Core Prime 4G stands against Motorola Moto G4 Play and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Motorola Moto G4 Play is Rs. 7,999. The prices for both these products were updated June 24, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page