Compare Samsung Galaxy Grand Max vs Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro

Feature Comparison

  • The Samsung Galaxy Grand Max's Screen Size measures in at 5.25 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 4.0% more
  • Internal Storage of Samsung Galaxy Grand Max is the same as Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro
  • The Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro's got 2GB RAM, while Samsung Galaxy Grand Max's RAM is 1.5GB
 
Samsung Galaxy Grand Max
Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
73 Value For Money Score
68 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.25 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
278 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Samsung Exynos   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 Exynos 3475   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 306 Mali-T720   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama Auto Mode, Beauty Face, Continuous Shot, Interval Shot, Panorama Mode, Front Facing camera with Palm Gesture Selfie and 120 degree Selfie Mode.   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- TouchWiz UI   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
146.15 x 75 x 7.95 142.3 x 72.1 x 8.5   
Weight
161 grams 149 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Grey Black, Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
12GB 8.65GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Samsung Galaxy Grand Max vs Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Grand MaxSamsung Galaxy On5 Pro  
Screen Size 5.25 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP8MP  
RAM 1.5GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp HD display is good to look at
  • Feels good to hold in hand, thanks to the curved edges
  • Decent performance with the Exynos chipset and 2GB of RAM, not for gamers though
  • Runs on the latest Android Marshmallow 6.0 out of the box
  • S-Bike Mode is helpful for bike riders
The Bad
  • Lacks Ambient Light Sensor
  • No AMOLED display
  • Samsung bloatware pre-installed
  • Average rear camera output in low light

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Grand Max with Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro. When you see Samsung Galaxy Grand Max Vs Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Grand Max stands against Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro is Rs. 7,490. The prices for both these products were updated October 24, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page