Compare Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) vs Xolo Era 2X 3GB

Feature Comparison

  • Xolo Era 2X 3GB has 10.0% more Screen Size
  • Xolo Era 2X 3GB's got 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Xolo Era 2X 3GB's got 66.0% more RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016)
Xolo Era 2X 3GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
36 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
58 Value For Money Score
77 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
245 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Samsung Exynos MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.25GHz   
Processor
Exynos 3475 MediaTek MT6737   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 Mali-T720 MP1   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 8MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection Auto Focus Rear Camera with 5P Largan Lens, F2.0, Blue Glass Filter, Face Beauty, HDR, Panorama, Gesture Recognition, Voice Capture, Smile Shot, Face Detection, Self Timer, Time Lapse Video   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
132.6 x 69.3 x 8.9 144 x x72.3 x 9.5   
Weight
131 grams -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Gold, Black Black and Gun, Latte Gold   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2050mAh 2500mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) vs Xolo Era 2X 3GB Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016)Xolo Era 2X 3GB  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP8MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2050mAh2500mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Comfortable size for one handed usage
  • 4G LTE connectivity is present
  • Dual SIM support and expansion available via MicroSD card instead of a hybrid SIM slot
The Bad
  • Back of the device is known to be flimsy and creeky
  • Speakers are a bit of a dissapointment

Xolo Era 2X 3GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good build quality
  • Useful fingerprint sensor embedded gestures
  • Decent overall performance
  • Reliance Jio (VoLTE) supported
The Bad
  • Big footprint despite a 5-inch display
  • Average display quality
  • Median camera output
  • Poor battery life

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) with Xolo Era 2X 3GB. When you see Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) Vs Xolo Era 2X 3GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) stands against Xolo Era 2X 3GB and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy J1 (2016) is currently Rs. 6,890. The lowest price for Xolo Era 2X 3GB is Rs. 6,234. The prices for both these products were updated October 19, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page