Compare Samsung Galaxy J3 vs Micromax Canvas Evok

Feature Comparison

  • Micromax Canvas Evok has 5.5 inch Screen Size and Samsung Galaxy J3 has 5 inch Screen Size
  • Micromax Canvas Evok's Internal Storage is 50.0% more
  • The Micromax Canvas Evok's RAM measures in at 3GB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 50.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy J3
Micromax Canvas Evok
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
77 Value For Money Score
75 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Spreadtrum Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.5GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
Spreadtrum SC9830 Qualcomm Snapdragon 415   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 5.1 Lollipop Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
TouchWiz UI -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
142.3 x 71 x 7.9 -   
Weight
138 grams -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Gold, White Black   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
4.4GB 11.12GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 64GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No No   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy J3 vs Micromax Canvas Evok Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy J3Micromax Canvas Evok  
Screen Size 5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1.5GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy J3 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Thanks to an AMOLED panel, the colors are crisp and punchy with good contrasts
  • An inbuilt S-Bike mode allows for safe bike riding
The Bad
  • No Gorilla Glass protection
  • Launched with an older Android version (Android Lollipop) with no information on updates
  • Lack of basic sensors such as Ambient Light Sensor or Magnetometer
  • A rather new and unknown processor

Micromax Canvas Evok Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Decent performance, thanks to the latest Octa Core Snapdragon 415 with 3GB RAM
  • Good battery backup
  • Supports 4G LTE with VoLTE
  • Full HD video recording
The Bad
  • Average display quality at just 267PPI
  • No Android Marshmallow out of the box

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy J3 with Micromax Canvas Evok. When you see Samsung Galaxy J3 Vs Micromax Canvas Evok comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy J3 stands against Micromax Canvas Evok and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy J3 is currently Rs. 7,990. The prices for both these products were updated August 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page