Compare Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB vs Vivo V5s

Feature Comparison

  • Both Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB and Vivo V5s have same Screen Size
  • Vivo V5s has 64GB Internal Storage, whereas Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB has 32GB Internal Storage
  • The Vivo V5s has 4GB RAM, which is 25.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB
Vivo V5s
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
85 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
95 Value For Money Score
75 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 267 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 4 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Samsung Exynos MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.6GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Exynos 7870 MediaTek MT6750   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 4GB   
Graphics
Mali-T830 Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 20MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR Face Beauty, Panorama, HDR, Night, Ultra HD, PPT, Motion Track, Professional, Slow, Fast, Voice Shutter, Touch Capture, Palm, Timer, Gender Detection, Filter, Watermark   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash, Front LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
TouchWiz UI Funtouch OS 3.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
151.5 x 74.9 x 8.1 153.8 x 75.5 x 7.55   
Weight
169 grams 154 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gold, Black Matte Black, Crown Gold, Energetic Blue   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
256GB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3300mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB vs Vivo V5s Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GBVivo V5s  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 3GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 3300mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP20MP  

Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Dedicated MicroSD card slot
  • Great battery life
  • Solid build quality and easy to hold
The Bad
  • A bit slippery back panel
  • Comes with a lot of bloatware
  • Lacks fast charging & 4K video recording
  • Sub-par camera performance in low-light conditions

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB with Vivo V5s. When you see Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB Vs Vivo V5s comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB stands against Vivo V5s and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 32GB is currently Rs. 14,900. The lowest price for Vivo V5s is Rs. 15,199. The prices for both these products were updated October 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page