Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) N9000 vs HTC 10 evo

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) N9000's is 3.0% more than HTC 10 evo
  • Both Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) N9000 and HTC 10 evo have same Internal Storage
  • RAM of Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) N9000 is the same as HTC 10 evo
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) N9000
HTC 10 evo
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
64 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
78 Value For Money Score
80 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.7 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
387 PPI 534 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Corning Gorilla Glass 5   
Chipset     
Brand
Samsung Exynos Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.9GHz 2GHz   
Processor
Exynos 5420 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T628 MP6 Adreno 430   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2MP 8MP   
Camera Details
Dual Shot, Simultaneous HD Video & Image Recording, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection Continuous shooting, Digital zoom, Optical image stabilization, Digital zoom stabilization, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Self timer, Scene mode, Touch focus, Face detection, Macro mode   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.3 Jelly Bean Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
- HTC Sense   
OS Upgradable To
Android 5.0 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Water Resistance, Dust Resistance, Fingerprint Scanner, GPS   
Dimensions (mm)
151.2 x 79.2 x 8.3 153.59 x 77.3 x 3.7-8.09   
Weight
168 grams 174 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm USB Type C   
Color
White, Black, Merlot Red Gray, Silver, Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
32GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
22GB 23GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 2TB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3200mAh 3200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes, 2.0   

Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) N9000 vs HTC 10 evo Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) N9000HTC 10 evo  
Screen Size 5.7 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP16MP  
RAM 3GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3200mAh3200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2MP8MP  

HTC 10 evo Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Fairly accurate & snappy fingerprint scanner
  • Good-quality display
  • IP57 rated water & dust resistant
The Bad
  • Outdated Snapdragon 810 processor
  • Expensive
  • No traditional headphone jack

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) N9000 with HTC 10 evo. When you see Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) N9000 Vs HTC 10 evo comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) N9000 stands against HTC 10 evo and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) N9000 is currently Rs. 25,000. The lowest price for HTC 10 evo is Rs. 48,200. The prices for both these products were updated October 23, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page