Compare Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB vs Oppo F3

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB is the same as Oppo F3
  • Internal Storage of Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB is the same as Oppo F3
  • Oppo F3 has 4GB RAM, whereas Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB has 3GB RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB
Oppo F3
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
93 Value For Money Score
78 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 400.53 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass Corning Gorilla Glass 5   
Chipset     
Brand
Samsung Exynos MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.6GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Exynos 7870 MediaTek MT6750T   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 4GB   
Graphics
Mali-T830 Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 16MP   
Camera Details
Beauty Face, Continuous Shot, HDR (High Dynamic Range), Interval Shot, Night, Panorama, Pro, Selfie, Sports, Sound and Shot, Wide Selfie +8 Front camera, Continuous shooting, Digital zoom, Optical zoom, Digital image stabilization, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Self timer, Scene mode, Touch focus, Face detection   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
TouchWiz UI ColorOS 3.0   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS   
Dimensions (mm)
151.7 x 75 x 8 153.3 x 75.2 x 7.3   
Weight
167 grams 153 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Gold Black, Gold, Rose Gold, Red   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- 1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories   
Storage     
Internal Storage
64GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
256GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3300mAh 3200mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB vs Oppo F3 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GBOppo F3  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 3GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 3300mAh3200mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP16MP  

Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp AMOLED display with 440 PPI
  • Display doesn't attract fingerprints
  • Satisfactory camera performance, even in low-light conditions
The Bad
  • Lacks ambient light sensor, thus auto-brightness doesn't work
  • Slippery back panel
  • Misses out on slo-mo video recording

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB with Oppo F3. When you see Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB Vs Oppo F3 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB stands against Oppo F3 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Oppo F3 is Rs. 15,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page