Compare Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB vs Vivo Y69

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB is the same as Vivo Y69
  • Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB has 50.0% more Internal Storage
  • Both Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB and Vivo Y69 have same RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB
Vivo Y69
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score   
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
93 Value For Money Score
77 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
401 PPI 267.02 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Samsung Exynos MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.6GHz 1.5GHz   
Processor
Exynos 7870 MediaTek MT6750   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-T830 Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
8MP 16MP   
Camera Details
Beauty Face, Continuous Shot, HDR (High Dynamic Range), Interval Shot, Night, Panorama, Pro, Selfie, Sports, Sound and Shot, Wide Selfie Continuous shooting, Touch focus, Scene mode, Digital zoom, Face detection, self timer, Geotagging, White balance settings, Exposure compensation, Panorama, ISO settings, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, Dual LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 7.1 Nougat   
OS Detail
TouchWiz UI Funtouch 3.2   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
151.7 x 75 x 8 154.6 x 75.7 x 7.7   
Weight
167 grams 163 grams   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Gold Champagne Gold, Matte Black   
Build Material
Metal Unibody Metal   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
64GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
256GB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Nano SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3300mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No No   

Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB vs Vivo Y69 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GBVivo Y69  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13MP13MP  
RAM 3GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 3300mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 8MP16MP  

Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp AMOLED display with 440 PPI
  • Display doesn't attract fingerprints
  • Satisfactory camera performance, even in low-light conditions
The Bad
  • Lacks ambient light sensor, thus auto-brightness doesn't work
  • Slippery back panel
  • Misses out on slo-mo video recording

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB with Vivo Y69. When you see Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB Vs Vivo Y69 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB stands against Vivo Y69 and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy On Nxt 64GB is currently Rs. 12,900. The lowest price for Vivo Y69 is Rs. 13,499. The prices for both these products were updated September 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page