Compare Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro vs Micromax Vdeo 3 (Q4202)

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro is the same as Micromax Vdeo 3 (Q4202)
  • Internal Storage of Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro's is 50.0% more than Micromax Vdeo 3 (Q4202)
  • Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro has 50.0% more RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro
Micromax Vdeo 3 (Q4202)
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
68 Value For Money Score
61 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
294 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Samsung Exynos Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.3GHz 1.1GHz   
Processor
Exynos 3475 Qualcomm Snapdragon 210   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
2GB 1GB   
Graphics
Mali-T720 Adreno 304   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 5MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Camera Details
Auto Mode, Beauty Face, Continuous Shot, Interval Shot, Panorama Mode, Front Facing camera with Palm Gesture Selfie and 120 degree Selfie Mode. Geotagging, Autofocus, HDR, FHD Recording (1080p), 30 Frames per second   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) -   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 6.0 Marshmallow Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
TouchWiz UI -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
142.3 x 72.1 x 8.5 145.5 x 73 x 9.55   
Weight
149 grams -   
Connectivity
4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio) 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Gold Gold, Gray   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 8GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
8.65GB 4GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
128GB 32GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2600mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
No -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro vs Micromax Vdeo 3 (Q4202) Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy On5 ProMicromax Vdeo 3 (Q4202)  
Screen Size 5 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP5MP  
RAM 2GB1GB  
Battery Capacity 2600mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp HD display is good to look at
  • Feels good to hold in hand, thanks to the curved edges
  • Decent performance with the Exynos chipset and 2GB of RAM, not for gamers though
  • Runs on the latest Android Marshmallow 6.0 out of the box
  • S-Bike Mode is helpful for bike riders
The Bad
  • Lacks Ambient Light Sensor
  • No AMOLED display
  • Samsung bloatware pre-installed
  • Average rear camera output in low light

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro with Micromax Vdeo 3 (Q4202). When you see Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro Vs Micromax Vdeo 3 (Q4202) comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro stands against Micromax Vdeo 3 (Q4202) and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy On5 Pro is currently Rs. 7,490. The lowest price for Micromax Vdeo 3 (Q4202) is Rs. 4,990. The prices for both these products were updated October 24, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page