Compare Samsung Galaxy SIII (S3) 16GB vs Meizu M3 Note

Feature Comparison

  • Meizu M3 Note's 5.5 inch Screen Size is more than Samsung Galaxy SIII (S3) 16GB's 4.8 inch Screen Size
  • The Meizu M3 Note's Internal Storage measures in at 32GB. When compared to the other product's Internal Storage, it is 50.0% more
  • Meizu M3 Note has 66.0% more RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy SIII (S3) 16GB
Meizu M3 Note
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
37 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
59 Value For Money Score
80 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.8 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
306 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 2 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Samsung Exynos MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.4GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
Exynos 4412 MediaTek MT6755 Helio P10   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
Mali-400 MPGX6650 Mali-T860 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1.9MP 5MP   
Camera Details
LED Flash, Simultaneous HD Video And Image Recording, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Image Stabilization. Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 4.3 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
136.6 x 70.6 x 8.6 153.6 x 75.5 x 8.2   
Weight
133 grams 163 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White White, Grey, Gold   
Build Material
Plastic Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2100mAh 4100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Samsung Galaxy SIII (S3) 16GB vs Meizu M3 Note Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy SIII (S3) 16GBMeizu M3 Note  
Screen Size 4.8 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2100mAh4100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1.9MP5MP  

Meizu M3 Note Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Good-looking metal construction
  • Good fingerprint sensor
  • Long battery life
The Bad
  • Not a class-leading performance
  • Average camera output

Samsung Galaxy SIII (S3) 16GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Gorgeous display with excellent colour reproduction
  • The battery life easily lasts a day
  • Some interesting gestures have been added in TouchWiz
  • Overall lightweight
  • The battery on the phone is user replaceable
The Bad
  • TouchWiz is still not optimized and feels confusing
  • Plastic build quality feels rather cheap
  • S-Voice is not really up to much good

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy SIII (S3) 16GB with Meizu M3 Note. When you see Samsung Galaxy SIII (S3) 16GB Vs Meizu M3 Note comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy SIII (S3) 16GB stands against Meizu M3 Note and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Meizu M3 Note is Rs. 10,499. The prices for both these products were updated March 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page