Compare Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i vs Apple iPhone 6s Plus

Feature Comparison

  • The Apple iPhone 6s Plus has 5.5 inch Screen Size, which is 12.0% more
  • Internal Storage of Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i is the same as Apple iPhone 6s Plus
  • The 2GB RAM on the Apple iPhone 6s Plus is 25.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i
We Love
Apple iPhone 6s Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
42 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
73 Value For Money Score
90 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.8 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD, 3D Touch   
Pixel Density
306 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Ion-strengthened Glass   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Apple A series   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.8GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Apple A9   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Dual-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 PowerVR GT7600   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 12MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1.9MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection Geo-Tagging, Simultaneous 4K Video And 8MP Image Recording, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, HDR (Photo/Panorama)   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, OIS, Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android iOS   
OS Version
Android 4.3 Jelly Bean iOS 11   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 4.4 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Apple Lightning Connector   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS   
Dimensions (mm)
136.6 x 70.6 x 8.6 158.2 x 77.9 x 7.3   
Weight
132 grams 192 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio), WiFi Calling   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Garnet Red, Pebble Blue, Titaniuma Grey, Sapphire Black, Amber Brown Rose Gold, Gold, Silver, Space Grey   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- -   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2100mAh 2750mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i vs Apple iPhone 6s Plus Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300iApple iPhone 6s Plus  
Screen Size 4.8 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP12MP  
RAM 1.5GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2100mAh2750mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1.9MP5MP  

Apple iPhone 6s Plus Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent camera
  • Battery backup that will easily last all day
  • 3D Touch is present which provides a unique way of interacting with the device
  • Lightening fast Touch ID to unlock the phone
The Bad
  • Gripping the phone could be a problem if you have tiny hands
  • No Dual SIM support
  • iOS does not take full advantage of a phablet sized big display
  • Storage cannot be expanded

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i with Apple iPhone 6s Plus. When you see Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i Vs Apple iPhone 6s Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i stands against Apple iPhone 6s Plus and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i is currently Rs. 12,689. The lowest price for Apple iPhone 6s Plus is Rs. 40,990. The prices for both these products were updated August 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page