Compare Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i vs Micromax Canvas 5

Feature Comparison

  • Screen Size of Micromax Canvas 5's is 7.0% more than Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i
  • Both Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i and Micromax Canvas 5 have same Internal Storage
  • Micromax Canvas 5 has 50.0% more RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i
Micromax Canvas 5
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
63 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
64 Value For Money Score
83 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.8 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
306 PPI 423.6 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Bezel Less
- No   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm MediaTek   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.3GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MediaTek MT6753   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Mali-T720 MP2   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
- No   
Front Camera Resolution
1.9MP 5MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
- No   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection -   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.3 Jelly Bean Android 5.1 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 4.4 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
- Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
136.6 x 70.6 x 8.6 -   
Weight
132 grams -   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Garnet Red, Pebble Blue, Titaniuma Grey, Sapphire Black, Amber Brown Grey, Brown, White and Champagne   
Build Material
- Metal, Plastic   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
- -   
Head SAR
- -   
In The Box
- Device, Charger & Cable Separate, SIM Ejector Tool, User Manual   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 14.83GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 64GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
- GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900   
3G Bands
- HSDPA 900 / 2100   
4G Bands
- LTE 850 / 1800 / TD-LTE 2300   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2100mAh 2900mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- No   

Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i vs Micromax Canvas 5 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300iMicromax Canvas 5  
Screen Size 4.8 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1.5GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2100mAh2900mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1.9MP5MP  

Micromax Canvas 5 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Vibrant 1080p AMOLED Display
  • Well-sized, good design
  • Good Performance
  • Decent Daylight camera quality
The Bad
  • Unsatisfactory Low Light camera performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i with Micromax Canvas 5. When you see Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i Vs Micromax Canvas 5 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i stands against Micromax Canvas 5 and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i is currently Rs. 12,689. The lowest price for Micromax Canvas 5 is Rs. 7,482. The prices for both these products were updated November 25, 2017.
Report an error on this page