Compare Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i vs Samsung Galaxy S6 64GB

Feature Comparison

  • The Samsung Galaxy S6 64GB's got 5.1 inch Screen Size, while Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i's Screen Size is 4.8 inch
  • The 64GB Internal Storage on the Samsung Galaxy S6 64GB is 75.0% more
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 64GB's got 50.0% more RAM
 
Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i
Samsung Galaxy S6 64GB
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
43 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
73 Value For Money Score
89 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.8 inch 5.1 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED AMOLED   
Pixel Density
306 PPI 575.9 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 4   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Samsung Exynos   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 2.1GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Exynos 7420   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Mali-T760 MP8   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 16MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1.9MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection Quick Launch, Tracking AF, Auto Real-time HDR(Front & Rear) , F1.9, Low Light Video(Front & Rear), High Clear Zoom, IR Detect White Balance, Virtual S   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, OIS, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.3 Jelly Bean Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 4.4 Android 7.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
136.6 x 70.6 x 8.6 143.4 x 70.5 x 6.8   
Weight
132 grams 138 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
White, Garnet Red, Pebble Blue, Titaniuma Grey, Sapphire Black, Amber Brown White Pearl, Black Sapphire, Gold Platinum, Blue Topaz   
Build Material
- Glass, Metal   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
16GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 55GB   
Card Slot
Yes -   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2100mAh 2550mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- Yes   
Fast Charging
- -   

Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i vs Samsung Galaxy S6 64GB Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300iSamsung Galaxy S6 64GB  
Screen Size 4.8 inch5.1 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP16MP  
RAM 1.5GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2100mAh2550mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1.9MP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy S6 64GB Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Super sharp AMOLED display with 576PPI
  • One of the best 16MP camera with 4k video recording support
  • Powerful chip and 3GB RAM performs well at all tasks
  • Supports 4G LTE with VoLTE enabled
  • Stunning design and build quality
The Bad
  • Below average battery life
  • No expandable storage

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i with Samsung Galaxy S6 64GB. When you see Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i Vs Samsung Galaxy S6 64GB comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i stands against Samsung Galaxy S6 64GB and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy S3 Neo i9300i is currently Rs. 12,500. The lowest price for Samsung Galaxy S6 64GB is Rs. 34,480. The prices for both these products were updated August 20, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page