Compare Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini I9192 vs Oppo Find 7

Feature Comparison

  • Oppo Find 7's 5.5 inch Screen Size is more than Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini I9192's 4.3 inch Screen Size
  • The Internal Storage on Oppo Find 7 is 75.0% more
  • Oppo Find 7's RAM is 50.0% more
 
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini I9192
Oppo Find 7
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
50 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
66 Value For Money Score
88 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.3 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 2560 x 1440 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED LCD   
Pixel Density
256 PPI 534 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 2 Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.7GHz 2.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 801   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1.5GB 3GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Adreno 330   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1.9MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, HDR, Panorama 1/3" sensor size, geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.2 Jelly Bean Android 4.3 Jelly Bean   
OS Detail
- ColorOS UI   
OS Upgradable To
Android 4.4 -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Stereo Speakers, GPS   
Dimensions (mm)
124.6 x 61.3 x 8.9 152.6 x 75 x 9.2   
Weight
107 grams 173 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Mist, Blue, Pink, Purple, White Frost Black   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
5GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Micro SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1900mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- Yes, VOOC Flash Charge   

Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini I9192 vs Oppo Find 7 Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini I9192Oppo Find 7  
Screen Size 4.3 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1.5GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1900mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1.9MP5MP  

Oppo Find 7 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp Quad HD display with 534PPI
  • Decent performance with Snapdragon 801 combined with 3GB RAM
  • Good battery life
  • Stereo speakers for good multimedia experience
The Bad
  • Runs on way old Android version 4.3 Jelly Bean
  • Lacks fingerprint sensor

Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini I9192 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Brings the S4 design in a nice handy packaged size, ideal for one handed usage
  • Bright and well lit up screen
  • Overall the camera performs well and takes excellent videos
  • Call quality is fantastic
The Bad
  • The display lacks a Full HD panel
  • Lacks a dedicated notification light
  • The phone at times feels under powered, especially for memory intensive tasks
  • Internal memory is only 8GB

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini I9192 with Oppo Find 7. When you see Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini I9192 Vs Oppo Find 7 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini I9192 stands against Oppo Find 7 and which one you should buy. The prices for both these products were updated June 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page