Compare Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) 64GB N9000 vs Motorola Moto Z2 Play

Feature Comparison

  • The 5.7 inch Screen Size on the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) 64GB N9000 is 3.0% more
  • Both Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) 64GB N9000 and Motorola Moto Z2 Play have same Internal Storage
  • The Motorola Moto Z2 Play's got 4GB RAM, while Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) 64GB N9000's RAM is 3GB
 
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) 64GB N9000
Motorola Moto Z2 Play
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
81 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
78 Value For Money Score
75 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.7 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
AMOLED AMOLED   
Pixel Density
387 PPI 401 PPI   
Screen Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3 -   
Chipset     
Brand
Samsung Exynos Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.9GHz 2.2GHz   
Processor
Exynos 5420 Qualcomm Snapdragon 626   
Processor Type
Octa-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
3GB 4GB   
Graphics
Mali-T628 MP6 Adreno 506   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
13UP 12MP   
Front Camera Resolution
2UP 5MP   
Camera Details
Dual Shot, Simultaneous HD Video & Image Recording, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, Auto-HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.3 Jelly Bean Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB USB Type C   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Water Resistance, Dust Resistance, Fingerprint Scanner, GPS   
Dimensions (mm)
151.2 x 79.2 x 8.3 -   
Weight
168 grams 145 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Rose Gold Black, Rose Gold White, Pink Fine Gold, Lunar Gray   
Build Material
- -   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
64GB 64GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 256GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Single Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
3200mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes   

Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) 64GB N9000 vs Motorola Moto Z2 Play Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) 64GB N9000Motorola Moto Z2 Play  
Screen Size 5.7 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 13UP12MP  
RAM 3GB4GB  
Battery Capacity 3200mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 2UP5MP  

Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) 64GB N9000 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Excellent display clarity for users
  • Comes with screen protection out of the box, which is a big plus
  • Excellent back camera quality and experience for images and videos
The Bad
  • Average battery life for moderate to heavy phone users
  • Screen size may be a bit much for some users due to palm-fit concerns

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) 64GB N9000 with Motorola Moto Z2 Play. When you see Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) 64GB N9000 Vs Motorola Moto Z2 Play comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy Note 3 (Note III) 64GB N9000 stands against Motorola Moto Z2 Play and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Motorola Moto Z2 Play is Rs. 26,999. The prices for both these products were updated August 17, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page