Compare Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH vs Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime

Feature Comparison

  • The Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime's got 5 inch Screen Size, while Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH's Screen Size is 4 inch
  • The Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime has 32GB Internal Storage, which is 87.0% more
  • The Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime's got 3GB RAM, while Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH's RAM is 512MB
 
Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH
We Love
Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
16 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
49 Value For Money Score
85 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 1280 x 720 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233.2 PPI 294 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
- Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.4GHz   
Processor
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 430   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
512MB 3GB   
Graphics
- Adreno 505   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
- 5MP   
Camera Details
Anti-fog, Continuous Shot, Night, Panorama, Sports Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face/Smile Detection, HDR, Panorama   
Video Recording Resolution
HD Video Recording (720p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Phase Detection Autofocus (PDAF), LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 6.0 Marshmallow   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) MIUI 7   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
FM Radio Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
121.4 x 62.9 x 10.8 139.30 x 69.60 x 8.50   
Weight
124 grams 144 grams   
Connectivity
2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Gray Gold, Silver, Gray   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 32GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
- 25.75GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
64GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Micro SIM, Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Micro SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
- Yes   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1500mAh 4100mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH vs Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime Specs

Specs
Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAHXiaomi Redmi 3S Prime  
Screen Size 4 inch5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 512MB3GB  
Battery Capacity 1500mAh4100mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP  

Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Very impressive battery life
  • Handy form factor and good build quality
  • Rear and front cameras take good pictures compared to others
  • Snappy performance, thanks to the 3GB RAM and Marshmallow based MIUI
  • Features like fingerprint scanner and IR blaster are huge plus
The Bad
  • Usability of either Dual SIMs or a Single SIM with a MicroSD card (Hybrid slot) can disappoint some

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH with Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime. When you see Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH Vs Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH stands against Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime and which one you should buy. The best price of Samsung Galaxy S Duos 3-VE SM-G316HHAH is currently Rs. 6,499. The lowest price for Xiaomi Redmi 3S Prime is Rs. 10,220. The prices for both these products were updated August 22, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page