Compare Sony Xperia C vs Motorola Moto G5 Plus

Feature Comparison

  • The Screen Size on Motorola Moto G5 Plus is 3.0% more
  • The Motorola Moto G5 Plus's Internal Storage measures in at 16GB. When compared to the other product's Internal Storage, it is 75.0% more
  • The 3GB RAM on the Motorola Moto G5 Plus is 66.0% more
 
Sony Xperia C
We Love
Motorola Moto G5 Plus
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
52 Value For Money Score
94 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
960 x 540 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
220.3 PPI 424 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
MediaTek Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 2GHz   
Processor
MediaTek MT6589 Qualcomm Snapdragon 625   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 3GB   
Graphics
PowerVR SGX544 Adreno 506   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 12MP   
Front Camera Resolution
1MP 5MP   
Camera Details
Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection, HDR Geo-tagging, touch focus, face detection, panorama, auto-HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, Dual Tone LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- Android 7.0 Nougat   
OS Detail
Android (4.2) -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android O   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Water Resistance, Fingerprint Scanner, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
141.5 x 74.2 x 8.9 150.2 x 74 x 7.7   
Weight
153 grams 155 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC, VoLTE (Works with Jio)   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Lunar Gray, Fine Gold   
Build Material
- Metal Unibody   
Device Warranty
- 1 Year   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
29.95GB -   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
- 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2390mAh 3000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- No   
Fast Charging
- Yes, Turbo Charging   

Sony Xperia C vs Motorola Moto G5 Plus Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia CMotorola Moto G5 Plus  
Screen Size 5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP12MP  
RAM 1GB3GB  
Battery Capacity 2390mAh3000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 1MP5MP  

Sony Xperia C Pros & Cons

The Good
  • The power button is very well placed and easily accessible
  • Lasting battery backup
  • Support for Dual SIM as well as a separate slot for MicroSD card
The Bad
  • No HD display
  • Poor performance with plenty of lags
  • Below par camera performance

Motorola Moto G5 Plus Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sturdy build quality
  • Good battery life with Turbo Charging support
  • Decent camera on either sides
  • Dedicated Micro SD card slot
  • Excellent overall performance with near-stock Android Nougat
The Bad
  • Speaker output could have been better
  • Heats up slightly on extensive use of GPS
  • Bundled earphones are very basic

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Sony Xperia C with Motorola Moto G5 Plus. When you see Sony Xperia C Vs Motorola Moto G5 Plus comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia C stands against Motorola Moto G5 Plus and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Motorola Moto G5 Plus is Rs. 13,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 18, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page