Compare Sony Xperia C3 Dual vs Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen

Feature Comparison

  • Sony Xperia C3 Dual's Screen Size is 5.0% more
  • Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen's 16GB Internal Storage is more than Sony Xperia C3 Dual's 8GB Internal Storage
  • The Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen has 2GB RAM, which is 50.0% more
 
Sony Xperia C3 Dual
Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
54 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
61 Value For Money Score
80 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
5.5 inch 5.2 inch   
Screen Resolution
1280 x 720 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD AMOLED   
Pixel Density
267 PPI 424 PPI   
Screen Protection
- Corning Gorilla Glass 3   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 2.5GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 801   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Adreno 330   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
8MP 13MP   
Front Camera Resolution
5MP 2MP   
Camera Details
Sony Exmor RS Image Sensor, HDR, Superior Auto, Object Tracking – Lock Focus On A Specific Object 1/3" Sensor Size, 1.13 µm Pixel Size, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Panorama, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) 4K Video Recording (2160p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash, Front LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.4 KitKat   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
Android 5.0 Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Water Resistance, GPS, FM Radio   
Dimensions (mm)
156 x 78.5 x 7.6 140.8 x 72.4 x 9.97   
Weight
150 grams 144 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 4G LTE (India Compatible), 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC   
Audio Jack
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, Snow White, Mint, Red Cognac Leather, Royal Blue, White, White Turquoise, White Bamboo, Black Leather   
Build Material
Plastic Metal, Polycarbonate   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
8GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
5.01GB -   
Card Slot
Yes No   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Single   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2500mAh 2300mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
- -   

Sony Xperia C3 Dual vs Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia C3 DualMotorola Moto X 2nd Gen  
Screen Size 5.5 inch5.2 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 8MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2500mAh2300mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 5MP2MP  

Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Unique, useful software features
  • Solid acoustic experience from earpiece to speakerphone
  • Excellent build quality, feels good to hold
  • Very sharp Full HD AMOLED display with great color reproduction
The Bad
  • No MicroSD slot
  • Average battery backup

Sony Xperia C3 Dual Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Attractive design and decent build quality
  • Good camera performance, especially the front-facing one
  • Ample battery life
The Bad
  • Large bezels alongside the display

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Sony Xperia C3 Dual with Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen. When you see Sony Xperia C3 Dual Vs Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia C3 Dual stands against Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen and which one you should buy. The lowest price for Motorola Moto X 2nd Gen is Rs. 14,999. The prices for both these products were updated October 21, 2017.
 
Report an error on this page