Compare Sony Xperia E1 Dual D2105 vs Samsung Galaxy Core 2

Feature Comparison

  • The Samsung Galaxy Core 2's Screen Size measures in at 4.5 inch. When compared to the other product's Screen Size, it is 11.0% more
  • Both Sony Xperia E1 Dual D2105 and Samsung Galaxy Core 2 have same Internal Storage
  • The Samsung Galaxy Core 2's RAM measures in at 768MB. When compared to the other product's RAM, it is 33.0% more
 
Sony Xperia E1 Dual D2105
Samsung Galaxy Core 2
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #1Rank #2  
Spec Score 
100 /100
41 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
54 Value For Money Score
47 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4 inch 4.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
800 x 480 pixels 800 x 480 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
233 PPI 207.3 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm -   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.2GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 -   
Processor Type
Dual-Core Quad-Core   
RAM
512MB 768MB   
Graphics
Adreno 302 -   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
3.15MP 5MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
- 0.3MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Touch focus, Geo-Tagging, Face Detection, HDR, Self timer, Digital Image Stabilization, Panorama, Scene mode, Digital zoom, HDR, White balance setting, Geo-Tagging, Touch Focus, Face & Smile Detection   
Video Recording Resolution
480p Video Recording -   
Camera Features
Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
- -   
OS Detail
Android (4.4) Android (4.4)   
OS Upgradable To
- -   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
118 x 62.4 x 12 130.3 x 68 x 9.8   
Weight
122 grams 138 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black Black, White   
Build Material
Plastic -   
Device Warranty
1 Year -   
Warranty Details
- -   
Body SAR
0.647W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.629W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, User Manual -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 4GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
2GB 2GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 64GB   
OTG Support
- -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Mini (Normal) SIM Mini (Normal) SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM -   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Mini SIM -   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No -   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
UMTS 900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
1750mAh 2000mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-ion (Li-ion)   
Removable Battery
Yes Yes   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Sony Xperia E1 Dual D2105 vs Samsung Galaxy Core 2 Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia E1 Dual D2105Samsung Galaxy Core 2  
Screen Size 4 inch4.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 3.15MP5MP  
RAM 512MB768MB  
Battery Capacity 1750mAh2000mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP  

Samsung Galaxy Core 2 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Compact design
  • 3G connectivity
  • Dedicated Dual SIM slot and Micro SD expansion slot
The Bad
  • Poor battery life
  • Complains of poor touch calibration
  • Slow and sluggish performance

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Sony Xperia E1 Dual D2105 with Samsung Galaxy Core 2. When you see Sony Xperia E1 Dual D2105 Vs Samsung Galaxy Core 2 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia E1 Dual D2105 stands against Samsung Galaxy Core 2 and which one you should buy. The best price of Sony Xperia E1 Dual D2105 is currently Rs. 7,545. The prices for both these products were updated November 20, 2017.
Report an error on this page