Compare Sony Xperia E3 Dual vs HTC Desire 826

Feature Comparison

  • The Screen Size on HTC Desire 826 is 18.0% more
  • HTC Desire 826's Internal Storage is 75.0% more
  • HTC Desire 826 has 50.0% more RAM
 
Sony Xperia E3 Dual
HTC Desire 826
Highlight:
All Features
Only Differences
Rank Rank #2Rank #1  
Spec Score 
72 /100
100 /100
  
This score is assigned based on the product's specifications without taking price into consideration.
 
67 Value For Money Score
66 Value For Money Score
  
Display     
Screen Size
4.5 inch 5.5 inch   
Screen Resolution
854 x 480 pixels 1920 x 1080 pixels   
Screen Type
LCD LCD   
Pixel Density
218 PPI 400.5 PPI   
Screen Protection
- -   
Bezel Less
No -   
Screen Features
- -   
Chipset     
Brand
Qualcomm Qualcomm   
Processor Speed
1.2GHz 1.7GHz   
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 615   
Processor Type
Quad-Core Octa-Core   
RAM
1GB 2GB   
Graphics
Adreno 305 Adreno 405   
Camera     
Rear Camera Resolution
5MP 13MP   
Dual Rear Camera
No -   
Front Camera Resolution
0.3MP 13MP   
Dual Selfie Camera
No -   
Camera Details
Digital zoom, Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Digital Image Stabilization, HDR, Panorama, Self-timer Geo-tagging, Touch Focus, Face Detection, Simultaneous HD Video and Image Recording, HDR   
Video Recording Resolution
Full HD Video Recording (1080p) Full HD Video Recording (1080p)   
Camera Features
Autofocus, LED Flash Autofocus, LED Flash   
General Specifications     
Operating System
Android Android   
OS Version
Android 4.4 KitKat Android 5.0 Lollipop   
OS Detail
- -   
OS Upgradable To
- Android 6.0   
Device Type
Touchscreen Touchscreen   
USB Connector Type
Micro USB Micro USB   
Features
GPS, FM Radio Front Facing Stereo Speakers, GPS, FM Radio   
Sensors
Accelerometer, Proximity Sensor, Magnetometer -   
IP Rating
- -   
Dimensions (mm)
137.1 x 69.4 x 8.5 158 x 77.5 x 7.99   
Weight
144 grams 183 grams   
Connectivity
3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth, NFC 3G, 2G, WiFi, Bluetooth   
Headphone Jack Type
3.5mm 3.5mm   
Color
Black, White White Birch, Blue Lagoon   
Build Material
Plastic Plastic   
Device Warranty
1 Year 1 Year   
Warranty Details
1 Year for Mobile & 6 Months for Accessories -   
Body SAR
0.742W/kg -   
Head SAR
0.833W/kg -   
In The Box
Device, Charger & Cable Separate, Earphone, Cover -   
Audio Features
- -   
Storage     
Internal Storage
4GB 16GB   
Approx. User Available Storage
1.73GB 10GB   
Card Slot
Yes Yes   
Maximum Card Slot Capacity
32GB 128GB   
OTG Support
No -   
Communication     
SIM Card Slots
Dual Dual   
Network Type
GSM GSM   
SIM Card Type
Micro SIM Nano SIM   
SIM 1 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
SIM 2 Details
3G, 2G, Micro SIM 4G, 3G, 2G, Nano SIM   
Hybrid SIM (microSD + SIM)
No No   
2G Bands
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 MHz -   
3G Bands
UMTS 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 MHz -   
4G Bands
- -   
Battery     
Battery Capacity
2330mAh 2600mAh   
Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion) Lithium-Polymer (Li-Po)   
Removable Battery
No No   
Wireless Charging
- -   
Fast Charging
No -   

Sony Xperia E3 Dual vs HTC Desire 826 Specs

Specs
Sony Xperia E3 DualHTC Desire 826  
Screen Size 4.5 inch5.5 inch  
Rear Camera Resolution 5MP13MP  
RAM 1GB2GB  
Battery Capacity 2330mAh2600mAh  
Front Camera Resolution 0.3MP13MP  

HTC Desire 826 Pros & Cons

The Good
  • Sharp and vivid display at 401PPI
  • Stereo speakers with BoomSOund technology
  • Smooth user interface
The Bad
  • Below average battery life
  • Heats up while performing graphic intensive tasks
  • Does not support 4G LTE

Talk about this comparison, ask your questions!

This page helps you compare Sony Xperia E3 Dual with HTC Desire 826. When you see Sony Xperia E3 Dual Vs HTC Desire 826 comparison on Pricebaba, watch-out for the specifications of these phones and also the VFM score. With Pricebaba’s Value For Money Score, you can know how Sony Xperia E3 Dual stands against HTC Desire 826 and which one you should buy. The lowest price for HTC Desire 826 is Rs. 9,999. The prices for both these products were updated November 19, 2017.
Report an error on this page